“…Identifying drivers and extrapolating trends are especially sensitive to potential nonlinear dynamics, while trend comparisons on broad spatiotemporal scales often are less affected. By reviewing peer-reviewed studies on drivers in agricultural systems in Sub-Saharan Africa over the past 15 years, resulting in a selection of 60 studies, the most common methodologies for identifying drivers were found to be household surveys, focus groups, or interviews in areas where changes and trends have been identified (Nin-Pratt & McBride, 2014;Ouedraogo, Mbow, Balinga, & Neufeldt, 2015;Ouédraogo et al, 2017;Valbuena, Groot, Mukalama, Gérard, & Tittonell, 2015;Wood et al, 2014); quantitative correlation to potential factors (Abro, Alemu, & Hanjra, 2014;Bachewe et al, 2015;Epule & Bryant, 2015;García De Jalón, Iglesias, & Barnes, 2016;Michler & Josephson, 2017;Nielsen & Reenberg, 2010;Ouédraogo et al, 2017;Wood et al, 2014); and attribution by qualitative analysis to political and socioeconomic factors (Berakhi, Oyana, & Adu-Prah, 2014;Kamwi, Kaetsch, Graz, Chirwa, & Manda, 2017;Li, Oyana, & Mukwaya, 2016;Mbow, Mertz, Diouf, Rasmussen, & Reenberg, 2008;Sandstrom & Juhola, 2017). For any of these methodologies, a specified understanding of the patterns of change would guide the driver identification not only spatiotemporally but could also provide information on the characteristics of the driver, as drivers with gradual or abrupt effects might be distinguishable in the given context.…”