2011
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2011.22018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Use and Land Cover Change (LULC) in the Lake Malawi Drainage Basin, 1982-2005

Abstract: Changes in land use and land cover (LULC) in the drainage basin of Lake Malawi over the period 1982 -2005 were estimated from satellite imagery, and possible relationships were evaluated among the four major land-cover classes: cropland, forest, water, and savanna/shrub/woodland. AVHRR and MODIS sensors gave different values of areal extent of the four classes, limiting the feasibility of establishing consistent temporal trends over the entire period of the study, but forest land showed the least change among … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also show-decreasing productivity trends, especially in the southern region, correlate with a rainfall gradient that follows a north to south pattern [82]. The decreasing productivity across Malawi suggests that the landscape is homogenous in terms of vegetation types and cropping systems; areas with sparse vegetation have effect vegetation apparent reflectance lost due to the soil or bare areas, while in drier areas, the vegetation reflectance values are not expected to change much over time [55,83]. Decreasing trends that occur during main growing season, suggest crop failure due to erratic weather across Malawi, as prior extreme weather events, as reported in earlier years 2009, 2012, and 2015, subsequently affected crops in the main growing season [69].…”
Section: Malawi's Productivity Trendsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our findings also show-decreasing productivity trends, especially in the southern region, correlate with a rainfall gradient that follows a north to south pattern [82]. The decreasing productivity across Malawi suggests that the landscape is homogenous in terms of vegetation types and cropping systems; areas with sparse vegetation have effect vegetation apparent reflectance lost due to the soil or bare areas, while in drier areas, the vegetation reflectance values are not expected to change much over time [55,83]. Decreasing trends that occur during main growing season, suggest crop failure due to erratic weather across Malawi, as prior extreme weather events, as reported in earlier years 2009, 2012, and 2015, subsequently affected crops in the main growing season [69].…”
Section: Malawi's Productivity Trendsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The dominant land cover in the Lake Malawi and Shire River basins is cultivated land. In 2005, cultivated land covered 33.7%, while forest area coverage was at 24.3%, savanna woodlands and shrubs were at 19.9% and the rest (22.1%) was covered by water [37]. Land cover is changing in the basin towards more cultivated land and less savanna woodlands and forest [38].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study investigates the potential impacts of changes in climate conditions and does not consider changes in land use and land cover or water abstraction for irrigation. However, changes in land cover and expansion in irrigation farming in the course of the socio-economic development in Malawi, as has happened in the recent past can be expected to continue/expand in the future, that will also influence the hydrological system of the basin [37][38][39].…”
Section: Limitations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased runoff consequently leads to stronger soil erosion usually in areas with poor vegetation cover [8,[19][20]. Erosion of soil under continuous cultivation is the most serious form of resource degradation occurring in Malawi [3,8,19,[21][22][23]. The rate of soil loss in Malawi is currently estimated at 29 t/ha/year [24], which is higher than the previously reported 20 t/ha/year [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%