1998
DOI: 10.1086/452376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Tenure, Farm Size, and Rural Market Participation in Developing Countries: The Case of the Tunisian Olive Sector

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic Development and Cultural Change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions have been mixed. Results of positive effect of size on productivity have been explained by price and other policy distortions that are lower in larger farms (Kumbhakar and Bhattacharyya, 1992; Sawers, 1998), more intensive use of mechanization on larger farms (Zaibet and Dunn, 1998), insurance and financing constraints faced by poorer farm households that lead them to adopt less profitable strategies of cultivation (Kevane, 1996), and subsistence concerns of small farms that lead them to specialize in less profitable crops (Dorward, 1999; Fafchamps, 1992; Omamo, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions have been mixed. Results of positive effect of size on productivity have been explained by price and other policy distortions that are lower in larger farms (Kumbhakar and Bhattacharyya, 1992; Sawers, 1998), more intensive use of mechanization on larger farms (Zaibet and Dunn, 1998), insurance and financing constraints faced by poorer farm households that lead them to adopt less profitable strategies of cultivation (Kevane, 1996), and subsistence concerns of small farms that lead them to specialize in less profitable crops (Dorward, 1999; Fafchamps, 1992; Omamo, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other salient difference between low-income and high-income country agriculture is the degree to which mechanized implements are used. And there is evidence that larger farms and farms that become larger are more likely to be mechanized within countries (Zaibet and Dunn, 1998;Foster and Rosenzweig, 2011;Hornbeck and Naidu, 2014). However, in contexts in which all farms are mechanized, such as in developed countries, the mere use of mechanized equipment cannot by itself explain why larger farms are more productive than smaller farms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already stated, sustainable agricultural use of water impinges upon social, economic and political arenas. To allocate water more equally, land distribution and ownership need addressing via a structural change policy that can redistribute land, increase average farm size and push private ownership beyond the 90% figure at which it presently stands (World Bank 1996; Zaibet and Dunn 1998). The Ministry of Agriculture is currently defining a land consolidation programme and a plan for land exchange that would result in larger parcels.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%