Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3147356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Surface Temperature Reconstruction Under Long-Term Cloudy-Sky Conditions at 250 m Spatial Resolution: Case Study of Vinschgau/Venosta Valley in the European Alps

Abstract: In this paper, we present a new concept for predicting satellite-derived land surface temperature (LST) under cloudy skies over vegetated areas in the Alps. Although many different reconstruction methods have been developed, they require rarely available inputs, or they restore missing pixels from clear-sky observations with low spatial resolution (1-5 km), which makes them unreliable in heterogenous ecosystems. Given these limitations, we propose a station-based procedure to predict cloudcovered grids from 1-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where LSTFR denotes final downscaled LST data with residual correction applied, LSTfR is the indirect LST output after applying coarse resolution (CR) thermal model to the FR explanatory variables, and the term of (LSTCR -LSTfR CR ) FR indicates residual correction between coarse resolution surface temperatures and their corresponding upscaled fine resolution predictions resampled to spatial resolution of the kernels applied. As shown in previous studies (Bartkowiak et al, 2022;Bertoldi et al, 2010;He et al, 2019), driving forces of LST distribution in mountain regions may be related to many factors, including topography, vegetation content and climate forcing. To this end, selection of representative 250-m kernels was based on "the process-guided design" as an attempt to better explain LST variability in complex ecosystems (Mao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Thermal Downscaling Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where LSTFR denotes final downscaled LST data with residual correction applied, LSTfR is the indirect LST output after applying coarse resolution (CR) thermal model to the FR explanatory variables, and the term of (LSTCR -LSTfR CR ) FR indicates residual correction between coarse resolution surface temperatures and their corresponding upscaled fine resolution predictions resampled to spatial resolution of the kernels applied. As shown in previous studies (Bartkowiak et al, 2022;Bertoldi et al, 2010;He et al, 2019), driving forces of LST distribution in mountain regions may be related to many factors, including topography, vegetation content and climate forcing. To this end, selection of representative 250-m kernels was based on "the process-guided design" as an attempt to better explain LST variability in complex ecosystems (Mao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Thermal Downscaling Modelmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Additionally, the sharpening models were forced with 250-m incoming solar radiation granules that were obtained by means of geostatistical downscaling applied to daily DSSF product acquired by MSG/SEVIRI instrument (https://landsaf.ipma.pt). On average, root mean square error (RMSE) was equal to 2.64 MJ m -2 day -1 when compared to in-situ measurements over the Alpine region (Bartkowiak et al, 2022).…”
Section: Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reconstructed LST in this paper exhibited a high degree of accuracy, with an average RMSE of 2.20 K, average MAE of 1.51 K, and ρ greater than 0.9. Reconstructing the all-weather LST has consistently remained a topic of interest [5,48], and several studies have been conducted. For instance, Zhou, et al [49] proposed the data interpolating empirical orthogonal functions (DINEOF) method for LST reconstruction, with an RMSE of 4.57 K. Duan, Li and Leng [7] fused TIR and passive microwave data to reconstruct the LST, with an RMSE ranging from 3.50 to 4.40 K. Li, et al [50] introduced a three-step mixed gap-filling method, with an RMSE of 4.78 K. Long, Yan, Bai, Zhang and Shi [9] utilized a data fusion approach combined with bias correction to reconstruct the LST, with an RMSE of 2.72 to 4.00 K. Compared with previous results [41], the reconstructed LST in this study exhibits a higher precision and hence can provide a valuable reconstruction approach for future research and serve as a fundamental data source for studies related to the thermal environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional method to obtain the LST involves meteorological station and remote sensing (RS) observation data. However, the meteorological station distribution is relatively sparse, and the LST can exhibit significant variations within short distances [5]. Obtaining the LST through RS observation techniques offers high spatial coverage and easy accessibility, demonstrating a tremendous potential [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks, in particular, present a promising solution for obtaining a comprehensive description of temperature and humidity variations. By integrating localized sensor data with global climate information, neural networks can effectively capture the intricate relationship between these variables 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%