2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jd010257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land surface temperature from Ka band (37 GHz) passive microwave observations

Abstract: [1] An alternative to thermal infrared satellite sensors for measuring land surface temperature (T s ) is presented. The 37 GHz vertical polarized brightness temperature is used to derive T s because it is considered the most appropriate microwave frequency for temperature retrieval. This channel balances a reduced sensitivity to soil surface characteristics with a relatively high atmospheric transmissivity. It is shown that with a simple linear relationship, accurate values for T s can be obtained from this f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
260
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
260
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For four different sensors, the Ka-band data are extracted with the center of pixel nearest to the ground stations. The specifications of the MW sensors are listed in Table II. The brightness temperatures are converted into T s (T S,MW ) according to Holmes et al [10], [11] T S,MW = 1.11T B,Ka − 15.20 for T B > 259.8 K…”
Section: B Passive Mw Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For four different sensors, the Ka-band data are extracted with the center of pixel nearest to the ground stations. The specifications of the MW sensors are listed in Table II. The brightness temperatures are converted into T s (T S,MW ) according to Holmes et al [10], [11] T S,MW = 1.11T B,Ka − 15.20 for T B > 259.8 K…”
Section: B Passive Mw Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Ka-band temperature retrieval is recently expanded with the help of a global ground truth network and more strictly related to the skin temperature [10], [11], instead of to the 1-cm 1545-598X/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE [12] were compared to satellite-derived MW T s observations. The NAFE'06 campaign was located in the western part of the Murrumbidgee catchment, Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is based on thermal infrared (TIR) remotely sensed data, such as single channel algorithms, temperature and emissivity separation algorithms, and split-window algorithms, which have been used for sensors with one, two or multiple TIR channels, respectively [16][17][18][19][20]. The other is based on passive microwave (PMW) remotely sensed data, including the empirical and statistical, semi-empirical and physical methods, in which the lower-frequency (ď37 GHz) brightness temperatures (TB) and surface emissivities from passive microwave radiometry are usually used [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. For the former method, the retrieved LSTs are mostly within a relatively fine spatial scale; for example, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor aboard the Aqua satellite platforms provide daily, eight-day, and monthly LST products at 1 km (near) and 6 km (near) resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the land surface parameters, the accuracy of surface temperature and surface elevation will also have an influence on the atmospheric-corrected MVI_B. According to the validation in the paper [23], the accuracy of land surface temperature estimated using Equation (9) is about 4.5 K. Surface elevation used in this study was a combination of SRTM DEM and DEM from MYD03. The accuracy of SRTM DEM is less than 10 m [25], and the DEM from MYD03 is expected to have, at worst, 100 m uncertainty in the vertical direction [26].…”
Section: Results and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clear sky conditions, T s was directly derived from the MODIS land surface temperature product [22]. Under cloudy sky conditions, T s was estimated based on the vertical polarized brightness temperature at 36.5 GHz of AMSR-E [23]. The formula is shown in Equation (9):…”
Section: Atmospheric Effect Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%