2015
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2015.2468594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Surface Temperature and Surface Air Temperature in Complex Terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research, in agreement with findings by [20,37] over complex terrain and by [19] over the Corn Belt in the U.S., showed that nighttime LST provided a good proxy of minimum T air , while models with daytime LST had the lowest accuracy. However, in agreement with findings by [17] and [19] and following recommendations by [20], our study also showed that nighttime LST provided a good proxy of maximum T air . Interestingly, by combining both daytime and nighttime LST data, it is possible to improve the accuracy of maximum T air , while no significant improvement in accuracy is found for minimum T air estimates [19], indicating that daytime LST is not relevant for estimating minimum T air .…”
Section: Differences Between Daytime and Nighttime Lstsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our research, in agreement with findings by [20,37] over complex terrain and by [19] over the Corn Belt in the U.S., showed that nighttime LST provided a good proxy of minimum T air , while models with daytime LST had the lowest accuracy. However, in agreement with findings by [17] and [19] and following recommendations by [20], our study also showed that nighttime LST provided a good proxy of maximum T air . Interestingly, by combining both daytime and nighttime LST data, it is possible to improve the accuracy of maximum T air , while no significant improvement in accuracy is found for minimum T air estimates [19], indicating that daytime LST is not relevant for estimating minimum T air .…”
Section: Differences Between Daytime and Nighttime Lstsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the analysis results in Figures 11 and 12 showed that the month-to-month T air accuracy improved with the decrease in terrain roughness, in accordance with the findings by [19,20]. Further, in agreement with [18], we also observed high errors in minimum T air over water surfaces due to the inertia of water, which may lead to an underestimation or an overestimation of minimum T air according to the temperature of the previous months, respectively cooler or warmer than the present [18].…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Patternssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the T s products are pre‐filtered by the cloud mask (the pixel is cloud‐free if it has the grid value for T s ), Wan () stated that cloud contamination still exists in the V005 products since the cloud‐removing scheme is unable to remove the contaminated pixels under light and moderate cloud conditions. The contaminated pixels usually refer to the extreme low temperature at the top of clouds (Mutiibwa et al ., ). All the data used in this study have been scrutinized to ensure that there are no extreme T s values.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TVX method also needs ground observation and could not be used in ungauged basins and vegetation sparse watersheds. Statistical regression methods usually try to build the relationship between station observed Ta and remotely sensed LST, elevation, NDVI, surface albedo and other explaining variables (such as longitude/latitude) using multi-variable linear regression model or machine learning approaches [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Using MODIS LST products and observed daily mean temperature from 95 meteorological stations in the Tibetan Plateau, Zhang et al [36] compared the performances of several regression methods, including MLR (multiple linear regression), PLS (partial least squares regression), BPNN (back propagation neural network), SVR (support vector regression), RF (random forests) and CR (Cubist regression), and 15 different combination schemes of the four MODIS observations per day over the Tibet Plateau.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%