2016
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land surface models systematically overestimate the intensity, duration and magnitude of seasonal-scale evaporative droughts

Abstract: Land surface models (LSMs) must accurately simulate observed energy and water fluxes during droughts in order to provide reliable estimates of future water resources. We evaluated 8 different LSMs (14 model versions) for simulating evapotranspiration (ET) during periods of evaporative drought (Edrought) across six flux tower sites. Using an empirically defined Edrought threshold (a decline in ET below the observed 15th percentile), we show that LSMs simulated 58 Edrought days per year, on average, across the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, CABLE, SURFEX (ISBA) and JULES (used by the ACCESS, CNRM‐CM5 and HadGEM2 models, respectively) strongly overestimated the occurrence of low summer‐time Q le compared to observations at six flux tower sites (Ukkola, De Kauwe, et al, ). Here the ACCESS, CNRM‐CM5, and HadGEM2 models have the strongest amplification of heat extremes with EF in the wet regions (median Ω EF, T max ranging from −11.1 to −17.9; Figure a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CABLE, SURFEX (ISBA) and JULES (used by the ACCESS, CNRM‐CM5 and HadGEM2 models, respectively) strongly overestimated the occurrence of low summer‐time Q le compared to observations at six flux tower sites (Ukkola, De Kauwe, et al, ). Here the ACCESS, CNRM‐CM5, and HadGEM2 models have the strongest amplification of heat extremes with EF in the wet regions (median Ω EF, T max ranging from −11.1 to −17.9; Figure a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted responses of transpiration to eCO 2 are highly variable among process-based models depending on what processes are accounted for and their parameterization, highlighting the current uncertainty about plant water use in response to eCO 2 (De Kauwe et al, 2013). Recent findings further suggest that land surface models show systematic bias in simulating water and energy fluxes under water-stressed conditions (Ukkola et al, 2016). Due to the large uncertainty in the estimation of evapotranspiration that takes into account the effect of eCO 2 and the consequent warming, we build our analysis on reference evapotranspiration (ETo), which is a supply-independent measure of the evaporative demand of a terrestrial climate and represents the rate at which a given climate is trying to evaporate water from the soil-vegetation system (Scheff & Frierson, 2014).…”
Section: Naumann Et Al 3285mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our methodology is currently restricted to 10‐day dry spells out of a pragmatic choice of sampling sufficient events globally. Land schemes may perform well at this time scale but poorly at longer time scales relevant for seasonal drought (Ukkola et al, ).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%