2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05796-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land subsidence prediction model based on its influencing factors and machine learning methods

Abstract: Land subsidence has caused huge economic losses in the Beijing plains (BP) since 1980s. Building land subsidence prediction models that can predict the development of land subsidence is of great signi cance for improving the safety of cities and reducing economic losses in Eastern Beijing plains.The pattern of evolution of land subsidence is affected by many factors including groundwater level in different aquifers, thicknesses of compressible layers, and static and dynamic loads caused by urban construction. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of contemporary land subsidence prediction fields employ tree models. For example, Li et al (2023) used four machine learning approaches using support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), random forest (RF), and extreme random tree (ERT) to create surface subsidence rate prediction model and surface subsidence gradient prediction model. Ebrahimy et al (2020) employed augmented regression tree (BRT), Random Forest (RF), and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) techniques to generate and compare Land Surface Sedimentation Sensitivity Maps (LSSM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of contemporary land subsidence prediction fields employ tree models. For example, Li et al (2023) used four machine learning approaches using support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), random forest (RF), and extreme random tree (ERT) to create surface subsidence rate prediction model and surface subsidence gradient prediction model. Ebrahimy et al (2020) employed augmented regression tree (BRT), Random Forest (RF), and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) techniques to generate and compare Land Surface Sedimentation Sensitivity Maps (LSSM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current fields of land subsidence prediction use tree models. For example, Li et al [14] used four machine learning methods using support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), random forest (RF), and extreme random tree (ERT) to construct surface subsidence rate prediction model and surface subsidence gradient prediction model. Ebrahimy et al [15] used augmented regression tree ( BRT), Random Forest (RF), and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) methods to produce and compare Land Surface Sedimentation Sensitivity Maps (LSSM) and verified that the prediction accuracy of BRT model (AUROC=0.819) was higher than RF model (AUROC=0.798) and CART model (AUROC=0.764).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While InSAR techniques can accurately detect historical and current ground deformation, predicting future land subsidence remains a challenge. In recent years, machine learning and deep learning methods have emerged as promising approaches to overcome the limitations of traditional prediction methods, exhibiting vast potential in ground deformation forecasting (Li et al 2023; Wang et al 2023a; Xu et al 2023). Conventional machine learning techniques, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs), Random Forests (RFs), and Extremely Randomized Trees (ERTs), have demonstrated their effectiveness in ground deformation prediction (Dagès et Ma et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%