2013
DOI: 10.3133/cir1392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land subsidence and relative sea-level rise in the southern Chesapeake Bay region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Konikow (2013) Storage release from the confining unit sediments creates the potential for increased risk of land subsidence. Pope and Burbey (2004) determined that storage release from the finegrained sediments that compose the confining units in southern Virginia in response to large groundwater withdrawals has resulted in compaction of these sediments, explaining in part the increased rates of land subsidence and anomalously high rates of sea-level rise observed in the lower Chesapeake Bay area (Eggleston and Pope, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptualization Of the Hydrologic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konikow (2013) Storage release from the confining unit sediments creates the potential for increased risk of land subsidence. Pope and Burbey (2004) determined that storage release from the finegrained sediments that compose the confining units in southern Virginia in response to large groundwater withdrawals has resulted in compaction of these sediments, explaining in part the increased rates of land subsidence and anomalously high rates of sea-level rise observed in the lower Chesapeake Bay area (Eggleston and Pope, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptualization Of the Hydrologic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many benchmarks have deep rod construction or corrosion resistant metal disks set in a bedrock outcrop that prohibits excessive movement (FGCS, 1984; M. Schenewerk, National Geodetic Survey, oral commun., 2016), a localized disturbance such as land subsidence is possible. For example, subsidence has been particularly notable since the 1940s in the southern Chesapeake Bay region at rates of 0.004 to 0.016 foot per year (Eggleston and Pope, 2013). In addition to sea-level rise, aquifer compaction from groundwater pumping in the southern Chesapeake Bay region has indicated movement as illustrated in figure 8 (Eggleston and Pope, 2013).…”
Section: Process Selection and Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, subsidence has been particularly notable since the 1940s in the southern Chesapeake Bay region at rates of 0.004 to 0.016 foot per year (Eggleston and Pope, 2013). In addition to sea-level rise, aquifer compaction from groundwater pumping in the southern Chesapeake Bay region has indicated movement as illustrated in figure 8 (Eggleston and Pope, 2013).…”
Section: Process Selection and Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important component of relative sea-level rise, land subsidence, could be prevented or reduced in the future if groundwater pumping strategies were changed [27]. Future land subsidence caused by aquifer-system compaction can be reduced or stopped by changing water-use practices.…”
Section: Links Between Groundwater Withdrawals and Land Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future land subsidence caused by aquifer-system compaction can be reduced or stopped by changing water-use practices. Because aquifer-system compaction is the primary cause of land subsidence in the Chesapeake Bay region, reducing compaction can reduce land subsidence and associated flood risks [28]. In the Houston-Galveston area and the Santa Clara Valley, resource managers have successfully decreased land subsidence by moving groundwater pumping away from the coast, reducing groundwater withdrawal rates, and increasing aquifer recharge [29].…”
Section: Links Between Groundwater Withdrawals and Land Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%