1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1993.tb03769.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Set Aside: Is It Food Security?1

Abstract: Land set aside programs can provide substantial economic benefits in distorted agricultural markets. Their incidence of use is increasing in the US, Canada and particularly in the EC. Voluntary annual programs have a small negative impact on short run food security while more permanent programs have slightly larger effects. The long run impact on food security is determined by whether the program leads to soil conservation or not. Most set aside programs used in Canada, the US and EC have some negative implica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The long run impact on food security is determined by whether the program leads on soil conservation or not. Households who got fertile land planted with crops, the probability of getting enough harvest for home consumption increases and bring additional income to household (Gray and paddock, 1993).…”
Section: Soil Fertility Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long run impact on food security is determined by whether the program leads on soil conservation or not. Households who got fertile land planted with crops, the probability of getting enough harvest for home consumption increases and bring additional income to household (Gray and paddock, 1993).…”
Section: Soil Fertility Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%