Land Reform in the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
DOI: 10.4324/9780203448571_chapter_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land reform in Kyrgyzstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the number of officially unemployed people had slightly decreased in comparison with the first five years due to labour migration abroad, by 1996 the level of poverty in the country had reached 68.7% (Falkingham, 1999: 19). Because the land reform launched in 1991 did not provide sufficient improvement to the agrarian sector, in 1996 Akaev had to issue a presidential decree concerning the sale of land use rights (Bloch & Rasmussen, 1998: 94). In the end, however, in most cases the privatization of land mainly benefited the directors of collective farms (Radnitz, 2010: 63).…”
Section: Akaev's Quest For Legitimacy Through Cultural Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the number of officially unemployed people had slightly decreased in comparison with the first five years due to labour migration abroad, by 1996 the level of poverty in the country had reached 68.7% (Falkingham, 1999: 19). Because the land reform launched in 1991 did not provide sufficient improvement to the agrarian sector, in 1996 Akaev had to issue a presidential decree concerning the sale of land use rights (Bloch & Rasmussen, 1998: 94). In the end, however, in most cases the privatization of land mainly benefited the directors of collective farms (Radnitz, 2010: 63).…”
Section: Akaev's Quest For Legitimacy Through Cultural Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with five other Central Asian countries that similarly gained their independence with the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Kyrgyz Republic initiated a process of transition to a market economy in the agricultural sector that included land reform policies aimed at making agriculture an engine for economic growth (Bloch 2002;FAO 2015). However, of the five, the Kyrgyz Republic has been noted for being the most aggressive in its approach to restructuring agricultural enterprises, privatizing land, and promoting private farming (Bloch and Rasmussen 1998). Other countries pursued more gradual approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%