2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land reform and the new elite: Exclusion of the poor from communal land in Namaqualand, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Riparian vegetation benefits from these changes and explains the general trend of an increase in cover of riparian trees within the channel and floodplain areas of the repeat photos over time. 39 Lebert andRohde, 2007. 40 Hoffman andRohde, 2007.…”
Section: Land Use History As An Explanation For Observed Changes In Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riparian vegetation benefits from these changes and explains the general trend of an increase in cover of riparian trees within the channel and floodplain areas of the repeat photos over time. 39 Lebert andRohde, 2007. 40 Hoffman andRohde, 2007.…”
Section: Land Use History As An Explanation For Observed Changes In Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are signs of proper rangeland management. The rangeland succession model has informed rangeland policies in South Africa and Namibia for decades, and still does (Benjaminsen et al 2006;Lebert and Rohde 2007;Sullivan 1996). The ecological model predicts that vegetation in dryland areas continuously strives towards a natural equilibrium.…”
Section: What Is a Fence? Change And Difference In Southern African Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this model continues to inform land policies in Southern Africa (Archer 2002;Benjaminsen et al 2006;Rohde et al 2006;Scoones 1989). Land reform processes in South Africa during the last decade have subscribed to the degradation narrative, and subsequently turned away from a pro-poor strategy towards encouraging privatized tenure and support for emergent farmers in communal areas (Benjaminsen et al 2006;Lebert and Rohde 2007;Rohde et al 2006).…”
Section: Journal Of Political Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rural community dwellers, communal lands and their resources are the mainstay of most economic activities and rural livelihoods, including farming, hunting and the day to day gathering of natural resources such as veld products [1,2]. However, concerns over the demise of traditional pastoral resource use systems due to rangeland degradation, impacts of climate change, impacts of land tenure policies, expansion in commercial agricultural activities and conservation areas continue to occupy the central agenda in pastoralism literature [3][4][5]. Many pastoral communities are faced with challenges of shifts in land tenure as their communal rights are considered by development practitioners as a constraint that hinders development with a need to be modernised [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%