Land Policy and Food Prices: Evidence from a Land Consolidation Program in Rwanda

Abstract

Rwanda’s “Crop Intensification Program (CIP)” is primarily a land consolidation program aimed at improving agricultural productivity and food security. The program, which began in 2007, focuses on monocropping and commercialization of six priority crops: maize, wheat, rice, white potato, beans, and cassava. CIP has facilitated easy access to improved seed stocks, fertilizer, extension services, and postharvest handling and storage services. Although studies have documented the impact of CIP on changes in farm yield, incomes, and productivity, less is known about its impact on food prices. In this study, we examine the crop-food price differences in intensive monocropped CIP and non-intensive monocropped CIP zones in Rwanda. Specifically, the study evaluates price variations of beans and maize along with complementary food crops in intensive and non-intensive monocropped zones before and after the introduction of the CIP policy. We find that the CIP policy is not associated with differences in CIP crop prices between the intensive and non-intensive monocropped zones. Over time, prices increased for CIP crops but generally, the crop prices in the two zones were cointegrated. Prices for non-CIP crops in the two different zones did show price differentials prior to the implementation of CIP, with the prices in intensive monocropped zones being greater than in the non-intensive monocropped zones. Moreover, the prices in intensive areas are cointegrated with prices in non-intensive areas for maize and beans and these prices are converging. This indicates that farmers who intensively produced one CIP crop were able to go to the market and purchase other food crops and that price differences between zones have decreased over time, potentially making the CIP intensive farmers better off.

The Assessment of Agroforestry Practices in Mukura Sector, Huye District, Southern Rwanda

“…agents has been reported to lead to higher adoption rates [37]. Te efect of intercropping trees with annual crops, as has been demonstrated in this study, presents varied perceptions by diferent farmers, and is usually a complex phenomenon.…”

Tax-benefit microsimulation model in Rwanda: A feasibility study

“…Like other previous EICVs, the EICV5 (2016/17) has been used in various academic studies and research projects (Diao et al 2021;Khundi-Mkomba 2021;Maniriho et al 2020: 21-41;Muremyi et al 2019;Nsabimana et al 2021Nsabimana et al , 2022. For instance, Maniriho et al (2020) use EICV5 to evaluate rural household savings and their implications on welfare in Rwanda.…”

Does the inverse farm size productivity hypothesis hold for perennial monocrop systems in developing countries? Evidence from Kenya

“…Interestingly, the positive and statistically significant coefficient values associated with the farm size variable are an indication that farmers with larger farms tend to experience a rise in their farm income, yield and consumption level. In Rwanda, nearly 83% of the population live in rural areas, and the majority cultivate crops on less than one hectare (Nilsson 2018;Nsabimana et al 2021). Hence, in a country where the average landholding is roughly 0.3 ha per household, the uptake of modern farm inputs such as hybrid seeds, fertilisers and pesticides would positively improve sustainable farm yield and hence food security.…”