“…Yet, the 'tribal' level appears again in the 1990s in Glowczewski's work, in a dialectic of identity between an all-inclusive language-identified group (Yawuru) and identities based on dialect, traditional toponym or family. By the time Glowczewski was writing, there had been much debate in anthropology about the utility of the concept of tribe and tribal boundaries (Berndt 1959;Peterson and Long 1986;Sutton 1995a), the appearance in land claims of socalled 'language groups' (Rumsey 1989) and, more generally, the relationship between language, social identity and land affiliation (Merlan 1981). Merlan's and Rumsey's work, in particular, is suggestive of possible further finegrained research into the language referents in traditional myths, particularly those involving travel beyond Yawuru country, to see whether they contain assumptions about the identification of land with a particular language.…”