2013
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Grabbing and Global Governance: Critical Perspectives

Abstract: Land grabbing has emerged as a significant issue in contemporary global governance that cuts across the fields of development, investment, food security, among others. Whereas land grabbing per se is not a new phenomenon, having historical precedents in the eras of imperialism, the character, scale, pace, orientation and key drivers of the recent wave of land grabs is a distinct historical phenomenon closely tied to major shifts in power and production in the global political economy. Land grabbing is facilita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
112
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar ideas of co-benefits between peasant autonomy and agro-ecological sustainability were put forward by several other scholars [39][40][41][42][43][44]. In the wake of the global land-grabbing processes of past years, critical agrarian studies have studied the disproportionate accumulation of "empty" and "cheap" land in the hands of a few globalized, corporate agro-businesses or national governments at the expenses of peasant communities, mostly in rural hinterlands of the Global South [45][46][47]. These new dynamics of peasant dispossession and land enclosures not only threaten food security, property relations and income opportunities of indigenous communities, but they also heavily intervene into local land use patterns and agro-ecosystem functions [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar ideas of co-benefits between peasant autonomy and agro-ecological sustainability were put forward by several other scholars [39][40][41][42][43][44]. In the wake of the global land-grabbing processes of past years, critical agrarian studies have studied the disproportionate accumulation of "empty" and "cheap" land in the hands of a few globalized, corporate agro-businesses or national governments at the expenses of peasant communities, mostly in rural hinterlands of the Global South [45][46][47]. These new dynamics of peasant dispossession and land enclosures not only threaten food security, property relations and income opportunities of indigenous communities, but they also heavily intervene into local land use patterns and agro-ecosystem functions [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Asimismo, revela aspectos de la globalización económica, ya que es facilitado por flujos cada vez más rápidos y extensos de capitales, bienes e ideas a través de ejes de poder más policéntricos que la tradición Norte-Sur (Margulis, McKeon & Borras, 2013).…”
Section: China Como Estado Acaparador De Tierrasunclassified
“…ssue of o global earch by international henomenon (Cotula et al 2009;World Bank 2009;GTZ 2009;Friis and Reenberg, 2010; d arp g of f of numbers to informing actors' entities and preferences (Margulis, McKeon and Borras 2013). Despite these tensions about the …”
Section: Ising Interest In Land and Demand For Global Governance E Ve Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus definition and therefore significant scholarly (and real world political) debate about what is and is not land grabbing (see Margulis, McKeon and Borras 2013). R s of control grabbing that is defined as:…”
Section: 'Land Grabbing' As Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%