2015
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Cover Transition in Northern Tanzania

Abstract: Land conversion in sub‐Saharan Africa has profound biophysical, ecological, political and social consequences for human well‐being and ecosystem services. Understanding the process of land cover changes and transitions is essential for good ecosystem management policy that would lead to improved agricultural production, human well‐being and ecosystems health. This study aimed to assess land cover transitions in a typical semi‐arid degraded agro‐ecosystems environment within the Pangani river basin in northern … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we assumed the land use/cover type with the maximal negative change proportion transitioned to the type with the maximal positive change proportion, but ignored transitions with maximal change areas of <0.05%. To examine whether the observed transitions were driven by statistical systematic processes or random processes, we detected the signals of land cover change or transition using the same method as in previous studies, which adopted the Chi-square approach to compare the observed transition matrix with an expected matrix generated under random processes (Ouedraogo et al 2016, Braimoh 2006, Pontius et al 2004. Unlike previous studies that have detected systematic and random land cover transitions in a landscape, we performed a pixel-wise detection at the 0.05 • scale.…”
Section: Land Use and Land Cover Change In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assumed the land use/cover type with the maximal negative change proportion transitioned to the type with the maximal positive change proportion, but ignored transitions with maximal change areas of <0.05%. To examine whether the observed transitions were driven by statistical systematic processes or random processes, we detected the signals of land cover change or transition using the same method as in previous studies, which adopted the Chi-square approach to compare the observed transition matrix with an expected matrix generated under random processes (Ouedraogo et al 2016, Braimoh 2006, Pontius et al 2004. Unlike previous studies that have detected systematic and random land cover transitions in a landscape, we performed a pixel-wise detection at the 0.05 • scale.…”
Section: Land Use and Land Cover Change In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with changes in temperature and showed stronger correlation coefficients with temperature than with precipitation, but the grids showing a significant correlation with these factors accounted for only a small proportion of the total for both precipitation and temperature. KEYWORDS carbon cycling, carbon use efficiency, China, climate change, land-use change, net ecosystem productivity 1 | INTRODUCTION Land degradation can be assessed based on many aspects, such as land cover change (Ouedraogo, Barron, Tumbo, & Kahimba, 2016), soil deterioration (Ramos-Scharron & Thomaz, 2017), and carbon stock changes (Lal, 2002;Nyamadzawo, Shukla, & Lal, 2008). The problem of global warming, which is mainly caused by large amounts of carbon emissions, has continuously worsened and caused significant damage (Wallace, Held, Thompson, Trenberth, & Walsh, 2014); it may drive more serious impacts and risks in the future and has the high potential to aggravate land degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagonal entries indicate the amount of LULC categories that remained unchanged between Time 1 and Time 2, whereas the off-diagonal elements account for a conversion from one class to another LULC classes [85,86]. The change detection matrix was further analyzed in order to calculate gain, loss, persistence, net change, total change, swap, and gain to persistence, loss to persistence, the net change to persistence for each LULC category between Time 1 and Time 2 [85][86][87]. The loss column represents the amount of loss for a LULC category i between Time 1 and Times 2, while the gain row indicates the amount of gain for a LULC category j between the same periods [85].…”
Section: Lulcc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%