2003
DOI: 10.1080/01431160210154858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land cover mapping in support of LAI and FPAR retrievals from EOS-MODIS and MISR: Classification methods and sensitivities to errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The input data include spectral and temporal information from MODIS bands 1-7, supplemented by the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) [35]. The five different land cover classifications in MCD12Q1 are: (i) The 17-class International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) classification, MODIS LC-1 [8,36]; (ii) The 14-class University of Maryland classification (UMD) [9]; (iii) A 10-class system used by the MODIS LAI/FPAR algorithm [37,38]; (iv) An 8-biome classification proposed by Running et al [39]; and (v) A 12-class plant functional type classification [40].…”
Section: Modis Land Cover Type Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input data include spectral and temporal information from MODIS bands 1-7, supplemented by the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) [35]. The five different land cover classifications in MCD12Q1 are: (i) The 17-class International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) classification, MODIS LC-1 [8,36]; (ii) The 14-class University of Maryland classification (UMD) [9]; (iii) A 10-class system used by the MODIS LAI/FPAR algorithm [37,38]; (iv) An 8-biome classification proposed by Running et al [39]; and (v) A 12-class plant functional type classification [40].…”
Section: Modis Land Cover Type Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most likely, this is due to the overlap in parameterization between the classes. Applying CRASh to image data will have to reveal if the chaotic spatial or temporal variation of the solution observed by other authors [41] is overcome with the parameterization used in this study.…”
Section: Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation of the approach is not the automated model inversion per se, but the exploitation of novel methods to ensure stable RTM inversions for mono-temporal high resolution data in an operational setting where inclusion of a priori information on the variables is strongly hampered. Whereas operational algorithms for medium to low resolution imagery can rely on more frequent coverage, which facilitates land cover classifications in support of retrievals optimized for specific biomes [13,41], a similar option is not offered for the locally operating high resolution systems. Thus, alternative ways are exploited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This product is derived from the MODIS output first released by the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at the end of 2008, with processed yearly observation data from the Terra and Aqua satellites applied to depict land cover types. The chosen dataset consist of five land cover classification systems: IGBP global vegetation classification scheme [32]; UMD vegetation classification scheme based on the modified IGBP classification system [33]; LAI/FPAR scheme adopted by MODIS Leaf Area Index and Fractional Photosynthetically Active Radiation (LAI/FPAR) products (MOD15) [34,35]; NPP scheme adopted by the MODIS net primary productivity (NPP) product (MOD17) [36]; and Plant Functional Type (PFT) land cover classification scheme [37]. In our study, five MCD12Q1 data layers updated in 2014 are selected.…”
Section: Modis Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%