2020
DOI: 10.31577/caosp.2020.50.3.672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LAMOST J202629.80+423652.0 is not a symbiotic star

Abstract: LAMOST J202629.80+423652.0 has been recently classified as a new symbiotic star containing a long-period Mira, surrounded by dust (Dtype) and displaying in the optical spectra high ionization emission lines, including the Raman-scattered OVI at 6825 Å. We have observed LAMOST J202629.80+423652.0 photometrically in the BVRI bands and spectroscopically over the 3500-8000 Å range. We have found it to be a normal G8 IV sub-giant star, deprived of any emission line in its spectrum, and reddened by EB−V =0.35 mag. C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute flux calibration of the comet images was carried out by measuring field stars. For this, we used the catalogs UCAC4 (Zacharias et al 2013) and APASS (Henden & Munari 2014). The observations were carried out in conditions with good seeing, of namely ∼1.5 ′′ .…”
Section: M Rcc Telescopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute flux calibration of the comet images was carried out by measuring field stars. For this, we used the catalogs UCAC4 (Zacharias et al 2013) and APASS (Henden & Munari 2014). The observations were carried out in conditions with good seeing, of namely ∼1.5 ′′ .…”
Section: M Rcc Telescopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several surveys have focused on discovering new symbiotic stars, both in the Milky Way (e.g., Corradi et al 2008Corradi et al , 2010Kniazev et al 2009;Miszalski et al 2013;Miszalski & Mikołajewska 2014;Rodríguez-Flores et al 2014;Akras et al 2021;Munari et al 2021;Akras 2023) and in the Local Group (e.g., Gonçalves et al 2008;Mikołajewska et al 2014Mikołajewska et al , 2017Gonçalves et al 2015;Ilkiewicz et al 2018;Saeedi et al 2019). However, many of the candidates accumulated over the years have only been very poorly studied, and several are in fact included in this category of objects incorrectly (see, e.g., the case of LAMOST J202629.80 +423652.0 in Andreoli & Munari 2020). Based on our New Online Database of Symbiotic Variables (Merc et al 2019), we have initiated an observational campaign to analyze some of the supposed but poorly characterized symbiotic stars and candidates (see also Merc et al 2020Merc et al , 2021Merc et al , 2022bMerc et al , 2023.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%