2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lamivudine Therapy in Kidney Allograft Recipients Who Are Seropositive for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Resistance rates across the trials were significant at 18% after median treatment duration of 18 months. Studies evaluating the benefits of prophylactic lamivudine versus treatment only on reactivation suggest that with the latter approach the majority of patients will end up on treatment (Chan et al, 2002) and may have a worse outcome than those treated prophylactically (Filik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Management Post Transplant-antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance rates across the trials were significant at 18% after median treatment duration of 18 months. Studies evaluating the benefits of prophylactic lamivudine versus treatment only on reactivation suggest that with the latter approach the majority of patients will end up on treatment (Chan et al, 2002) and may have a worse outcome than those treated prophylactically (Filik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Management Post Transplant-antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HBeAg positivity was variable ranging from 17–100% patients while in our study it was 77%. In five studies[1417252728] liver enzyme status at the time of starting lamivudine was not available, while in the remaining studies, ALT was elevated in most of the patients. Liver biopsy findings were not available in eight studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a small study, LAM given as either prophylactic or preemptive treatment was proven superior to salvage therapy when liver dysfunction is evident [51] . None of the HBsAg positive patients receiving prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy developed reactivation, while 50% of the patients not been treated suffered reactivation [51,52] . These results were confirmed by others, but there is some controversy about the clinical impact of prophylactic/preemptive therapy vs salvage therapy [51][52][53][54][55] .…”
Section: Ridruejo E Nuc Treatment In Rt Patientsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…None of the HBsAg positive patients receiving prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy developed reactivation, while 50% of the patients not been treated suffered reactivation [51,52] . These results were confirmed by others, but there is some controversy about the clinical impact of prophylactic/preemptive therapy vs salvage therapy [51][52][53][54][55] . One study showed that there was no differences in survival between HBsAg positive RT patients treated preemptively with LAM and HBsAg negative controls.…”
Section: Ridruejo E Nuc Treatment In Rt Patientsmentioning
confidence: 94%