2000
DOI: 10.2535/ofaj1936.76.6_303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lamination of the Masticatory Muscles in the Kangaroo According to Their Innervation

Abstract: Summary: An analysis of the laminations of the masseteric, zygomaticomandibular and temporalis muscles of the Red Kangaroo (Macropus Rufus) and all of the masticatory muscles of the Eastern Gray Kangaroo (Macropus Giganteus) was carried out based on their innervation. The masseteric muscle was divided into superficial and deep layers; the superficial layer was further subdivided into three laminae from the rostro-lateral portion to caudo-internal portion. The deep layer was divided into lateral, caudo-internal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between feeding strategy and morphology in kangaroos has been investigated by several researchers, and the results have indicated differences in dental morphology and behavior associated with the feeding types (Sanson, 1979, 1980, 1989; Hume, 1982; McArthur and Sanson, 1988; Lentle et al, 1998, 2003). Studies of the masticatory muscles, however, apparently indicate a basic conservatism (Parsons, 1896; Windle and Parsons, 1897; Heighway, 1939; Yoshikawa and Suzuki, 1965; Sanson, 1980; Morton, 1981; Lentle et al, 1998; Nakajima et al, 2000; Tomo et al, 2007). With the notable exception of the work by Sanson (1980, 1989), and a paper by Lentle et al (2003), there have been no comparative studies of kangaroo jaw musculature between genera or of different feeding types.…”
Section: Summary Of Food Preferences and Key Cranial Attributes For Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between feeding strategy and morphology in kangaroos has been investigated by several researchers, and the results have indicated differences in dental morphology and behavior associated with the feeding types (Sanson, 1979, 1980, 1989; Hume, 1982; McArthur and Sanson, 1988; Lentle et al, 1998, 2003). Studies of the masticatory muscles, however, apparently indicate a basic conservatism (Parsons, 1896; Windle and Parsons, 1897; Heighway, 1939; Yoshikawa and Suzuki, 1965; Sanson, 1980; Morton, 1981; Lentle et al, 1998; Nakajima et al, 2000; Tomo et al, 2007). With the notable exception of the work by Sanson (1980, 1989), and a paper by Lentle et al (2003), there have been no comparative studies of kangaroo jaw musculature between genera or of different feeding types.…”
Section: Summary Of Food Preferences and Key Cranial Attributes For Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we can not say for certain whether the estimation is collect or not because of no performs of functional analysis. In previous studies of the lamination of the masseter deep layer in humans, dogs and kangaroo, no one has observed oblique structures (Tomo et al, 1993;Nakajima et al, 1998Nakajima et al, , 2000. Only the deep nerve layer of the P. cinereus's masseter displays four oblique laminae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the distribution pattern of the masticatory muscles in the pig, Koppe et al (1988) suggested that the paths of the nerves and the position of the aponeuroses were not related. Tomo et al (1993), Nakajima et al (1998Nakajima et al ( , 2000 and Nakajima (2001) have classified the masticatory muscles in dog, kangaroo and humans according to their innervations and proposed that this provides a better insight into phylogenetic relationships and function. Davison et al (1990) described the structure of the P. cinereus masticatory muscle but they did not recognize the lamination of the medial pterygoid muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the reverse laminar theory is not an accepted theory at present. Later, Tomo (1990), Watanabe (1997) and Nakajima et al (2000) attempted to separate the masseter into the layers from the innervations. However, no new theory superior to the laminar structure theory has as yet been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%