1980
DOI: 10.1115/1.3240677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar Flow Forced Convection in Ducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

62
661
4
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(736 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
62
661
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (9) was derived assuming that the thickness of the heat transfer tubes (t) is negligible and that Nu = 4.66 for the heat transfer fluid under laminar flow conditions [8].…”
Section: Metal Hydride Compressor System Technical Performance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (9) was derived assuming that the thickness of the heat transfer tubes (t) is negligible and that Nu = 4.66 for the heat transfer fluid under laminar flow conditions [8].…”
Section: Metal Hydride Compressor System Technical Performance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(281) of [4]. In [1] there appears to be no mention of the necessity to satisfy the First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy when one moves from one cross-section to another downstream cross-section; see [5][6][7][8][9]).…”
Section: Kamel Hooman Applied Energy 85 (2008) 70-72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…176-177 and 183-184 of Shah and London [4] for T and H cases, respectively. Since [1] covers the same ground as [2] and [3] one can question the need for [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed correlations were compared with conventional correlations and with available experimental data, and show very good agreement. Shah and London [8] gives information about boundary layer developed conditions, thermally and hydrodynamically entry length effects. Shekhar D. Thakre and V. B. Swami [10] discuss analysis of heat transfer characteristics through a straight and wavy profile rectangular microchannel heat sink with Reynolds number from 100 to 1000 and same effective length.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for good heat transfer effect length of channel should be less than thermal entrance length. According to Shah and London [8], thermal entrance length given as, L th = 0.11 × Re × Pr × D h …. (11) For design purpose thermally developing and hydro dynamically developed condition is assumed.…”
Section: G Thermally Developing Flow In Straight Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%