1984
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(84)90145-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar and turbulent natural convection in an enclosed cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
196
1
7

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
22
196
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertical walls were isothermal and horizontal boundaries were assumed adiabatic. Comparison of the fields of temperature and average Nusselt numbers with [12,13] showed their satisfactory agreement.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vertical walls were isothermal and horizontal boundaries were assumed adiabatic. Comparison of the fields of temperature and average Nusselt numbers with [12,13] showed their satisfactory agreement.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The solution method and algorithm used were tested on a model problem of turbulent natural convection in a closed square cavity [12,13]. Vertical walls were isothermal and horizontal boundaries were assumed adiabatic.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat transfer through the walls causes density changes to the fluid inside the cavity and leads to buoyancy-driven circulation. The flow is assumed to be steady and laminar (Ra ≤ 10 6 ) based on extensive studies [15]. Air is used as the simulant and the properties are taken at ambient temperature except density.…”
Section: Benchmark Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow in a square cavity is turbulent for Ra > 10 6 [7,8,9]. For flow in vertical cavities Gan [10] used Ra  5.8  10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markatos and Pericleous [8] were the first to introduce a turbulence model in their calculations. Allocca et al [4] used the RNG (k -) model to analyze buoyancy induced flow through a singlesided window.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%