2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1622375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lamellar ordering in computer-simulated block copolymer melts by a variety of thermal treatments

Abstract: A lattice computer simulation of a symmetric A -B -A triblock copolymer melt is reported. This melt is quenched, in simulation, from an athermal state to 39 different temperatures using cooperative motion algorithm. Energy, specific heat, copolymer end-to-end distance, bridging fraction, lamellar spacing, concentration profiles, and microstructure visualizations are reported. The quenching simulation results are compared with those obtained by alternative thermal treatments, that is by slow heating and slow co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the simulations with small temperature jumps are essential for studying the kinetics of the system in response to a change in temperature, such as changes in the vicinity of the orderdisorder transition (ODT), the large temperature-step procedure that we employ here prevents the lamellar phase from adjusting to the continuously changing equilibrium period. [22,23] Once the lamellar morphology is formed at a temperature lower than ODT, it is very difficult for a system to adjust its orientation and its lamellar spacing to another temperatures because of the high potential barrier of moving an entire polymer from one lamella to another or to reorient the whole domain. Since we are interested in the equilibrium state of polymer chains with respect to the junction plane of individual lamellae, we can accept the limitations of nonideal lamellar spacing.…”
Section: Determination Of the Orientation Of Lamellar Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the simulations with small temperature jumps are essential for studying the kinetics of the system in response to a change in temperature, such as changes in the vicinity of the orderdisorder transition (ODT), the large temperature-step procedure that we employ here prevents the lamellar phase from adjusting to the continuously changing equilibrium period. [22,23] Once the lamellar morphology is formed at a temperature lower than ODT, it is very difficult for a system to adjust its orientation and its lamellar spacing to another temperatures because of the high potential barrier of moving an entire polymer from one lamella to another or to reorient the whole domain. Since we are interested in the equilibrium state of polymer chains with respect to the junction plane of individual lamellae, we can accept the limitations of nonideal lamellar spacing.…”
Section: Determination Of the Orientation Of Lamellar Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several former simulations of block copolymer systems have identified that there are one or two peaks in each C v curve. [38,[51][52][53] In the case where only one peak is identified, the peak is usually considered as order-disorder transition (ODT) related. [38,51,53] Using a cooperative motion algorithm, Banaszak et al observed a low-temperature C v peak besides the ODT related one from quenching simulations.…”
Section: The Variation Of Morphologies and Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38,51,53] Using a cooperative motion algorithm, Banaszak et al observed a low-temperature C v peak besides the ODT related one from quenching simulations. [52] Furthermore, we perform a detailed examination of morphologies as a function of the reduced temperature to locate the ODT. We find that each system commences an ordered morphology from the disordered state with a slight variation in T, and typical examples are shown in Figure 17.…”
Section: The Variation Of Morphologies and Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the possible arrangements of the triblock chains are different from those of the diblock chains. In particular, the triblock chains can form loop and bridge configurations, which are distinguishable in the ordered microphases 9–11. In a loop configuration both ends of the B block are located on the same interface, whereas in the bridge configuration the two ends lie on different interfaces 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%