2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lamellar eutectic growth with anisotropic interphase boundaries: Experimental study using the rotating directional solidification method

Abstract: International audienceWe report on an experimental study of the effects of interphase boundary anisotropy on eutectic microstructures using a new methodology called rotating directional solidification (RDS), which consists of rotating a thin sample with respect to a fixed unidirectional thermal gradient. The systems used are thin, large eutectic grains of the CBr4-C2Cl6 and In-In2Bi lamellar eutectic alloys. The shape of the observed RDS lamellar trajectories turns out to be a reproducible eutectic-grain-depen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
80
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a steady-state condition, the (lam ellar) tilt angle 0, is defined by tan 9, = Vd/ V . On the basis o f in situ directional solidification observations using thin sam ples o f m etallic and transparent organic eutectic alloys, a conjecture was form ulated recently that relates the value o f 6, to the anisotropy o f the free energy o f the interphase boundaries (interfacial anisotropy) [20,21]. The m ain underlying hypotheses are that (i) only the solid-solid interfaces are anisotropic (i.e., in a nonfaceted alloy, the anisotropy o f the solid-liquid interfaces has a negligible effect on the lam ellar grow th dynam ics) and (ii) the solid-liquid interface keeps virtually the same shapew ith m irror sym m etry about the m idplane o f a lam ella-as for standard (nontilted) lam ellae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a steady-state condition, the (lam ellar) tilt angle 0, is defined by tan 9, = Vd/ V . On the basis o f in situ directional solidification observations using thin sam ples o f m etallic and transparent organic eutectic alloys, a conjecture was form ulated recently that relates the value o f 6, to the anisotropy o f the free energy o f the interphase boundaries (interfacial anisotropy) [20,21]. The m ain underlying hypotheses are that (i) only the solid-solid interfaces are anisotropic (i.e., in a nonfaceted alloy, the anisotropy o f the solid-liquid interfaces has a negligible effect on the lam ellar grow th dynam ics) and (ii) the solid-liquid interface keeps virtually the same shapew ith m irror sym m etry about the m idplane o f a lam ella-as for standard (nontilted) lam ellae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sec. V, we will discuss separately (i) a way to estimate the accuracy of measurements of the interphase boundary Wulff plot using experimental observations with the so-called rotating directional-solidification method [21] and (ii) possible reasons for the absence of hysteretic behavior in the high-anisotropy case in the PF simulations. Conclusions and perspectives are presented in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in Refs. [22][23][24], the tilting angle of the phase boundary may considerably differ from the actual tilting angle. This is demonstrated for different anisotropy strengths in Fig.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of C 2 In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial front direction is conserved here owing to the restriction by the boundary condition. To mimic the local situation in the experiments [23], in which a circular disc was rotated so that the solidification front was in a fixed temperature gradient, here we varied the orientation of the long axis of the anisotropy relative to the direction of the long side of the simulation box. Here observed: (i) The usual critical anisotropy [s0 = 1/(2 n  1) for n-fold symmetry] that corresponds the limit for the occurrence of excluded orientations in the equilibrium shape (see e.g., [52]), yielding here 1/3.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of C 2 In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation