2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lamella-rod pattern transition and confinement effects during eutectic growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A long-lived coexistence of straight lamellae and rods separated by a sharp domain wall was thus evidenced. There was strong evidence that, at low velocity, a lamellar pattern of infinite extension would remain absolutely stable 64 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long-lived coexistence of straight lamellae and rods separated by a sharp domain wall was thus evidenced. There was strong evidence that, at low velocity, a lamellar pattern of infinite extension would remain absolutely stable 64 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It came thus as a great surprise that a transition from rods to lamellae was observed both in microgravity and ground experiments after a velocity jump [22,23]. Indeed, according to the scaling theory outlined above, a change of the velocity should change the overall scaling length, but not the morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This means that all the interphase boundaries are nearly normal to the sample walls (glass plates), which results in forming essentially two-dimensional (2D) lamellar microstructure. For regular eutectic structures, it is shown that the morphology of the phases, i.e., rod or lamella, depends on the phase fraction, [23] sample confinement, [24][25][26][27] velocity, [27] and thermal field. [28] Simultaneous growth of rod and lamellar morphologies is also reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] Simultaneous growth of rod and lamellar morphologies is also reported. [27][28][29][30] Recently, Khanna et al bring evidence that lamellar morphology is observed in the presence of interphase boundary anisotropy, although rod morphology would be expected due to the low fraction of the minority phase. [30] Despite numerous recent studies about the effect of the interphase boundary anisotropy on the solidification microstructures, its influence on the growth morphology of the phases is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%