1991
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(91)90390-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lambing and placental expulsion time after dexamethasone-induced parturition in Corriedale and Polwarth ewes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability in time from induction to the onset of labour has been attributed to a variety of factors. Rubianes et al (1991) reported that the genotypes of sheep used in their study (Polwarth and Corriedale) influenced the time difference from induction to parturition. Although the ewes of both breeds carried single lambs only, the interval from dexamethasone treatment to parturition was twice as long for the Polwarth than for the Corriedale breed (57.9 versus 28.8 h).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The variability in time from induction to the onset of labour has been attributed to a variety of factors. Rubianes et al (1991) reported that the genotypes of sheep used in their study (Polwarth and Corriedale) influenced the time difference from induction to parturition. Although the ewes of both breeds carried single lambs only, the interval from dexamethasone treatment to parturition was twice as long for the Polwarth than for the Corriedale breed (57.9 versus 28.8 h).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is essential to mention that no female in this study had retained placenta, being considered as "retained placenta" the non-delivery of the organ eight hours after delivery (Jainudeen & Hafez 2004). Previous studies describe that in sheep, induction of labor with dexamethasone rarely promotes retention of the placenta (Rubianes et al 1991, Kastelic et al 1996, Ingoldby & Jackson 2001, Santana et al 2010.…”
Section: Mean Values ± Standard Deviation Of the Time Between Labor Imentioning
confidence: 98%