1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01435.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lake Tana large barbs: phenetics, growth and diversification

Abstract: Among the Lake Tana large barbs of about 10 cm SL only representatives of the ' acute ' morphotype can be distinguished, in the size range 10-20 cm SL ' bigmouth big eye ' can be identified also. As for the rest, very few individuals can be confidently affiliated with a particular morphotype most of them looking like ' intermedius '. Even within the range of 20-30 cm SL some individuals are still difficult to identify. Principal component analysis of cranial characters revealed discrete groups of morphotypes. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this type of approach is difficult due to the high degree of polymorphism shown by species of this genus, in which species flock phenomena have been described (Nagelkerke et al, 1994;Mina et al, 1996;Reig et al, 1998). Recent electrophoretic studies have analyzed genetic variation at the population and species levels, as well as phylogenetic relationships (e.g., Berrebi et al, 1990;El Gharbi, 1993;El Gharbi et al, 1993;Karakousis et al, 1995;Machordom et al, 1995Machordom et al, , 1998Slechtová et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, this type of approach is difficult due to the high degree of polymorphism shown by species of this genus, in which species flock phenomena have been described (Nagelkerke et al, 1994;Mina et al, 1996;Reig et al, 1998). Recent electrophoretic studies have analyzed genetic variation at the population and species levels, as well as phylogenetic relationships (e.g., Berrebi et al, 1990;El Gharbi, 1993;El Gharbi et al, 1993;Karakousis et al, 1995;Machordom et al, 1995Machordom et al, , 1998Slechtová et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The morphotypes Intermedius, Zurki, Acute, Troutlike, Barbel, White hunch, Dark, Bighead, Bigmouth small-eye, Bigmouth big-eye and Carplike have been defined by Nagelkerke et al (1994). Acute hunch is designated according to Mina et al (1996a). The description of the morphotype Green intermedius is not yet published (M. Mina, pers.…”
Section: Samplirgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recruitment of assortative mating preferences and species identity signals by disruptive natural selection is a more likely cause of the evolution of reproductive isolation when it occurs sympatrically. The most widely accepted cases of sympatric speciation (Taylor and Bentzen 1993;Schliewen et al 1994;Mina et al 1996;Wood and Foote 1996;Filchak et al 2000) appear to have occurred along ecological axes (Schluter 1998). Due to the high packing of ecologically similar species, disruptive natural selection in rock cichlid communities is certainly multifarious (Rice and Hostert 1993;Via 2001).…”
Section: Evidence For Sympatric Speciation By Sexual Selection Inmentioning
confidence: 99%