2014
DOI: 10.1086/676140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lake benthic algae: toward an understanding of their ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…light availability, temperature), to which species often respond with decreased abundances. In contrast, these resources remain relatively stable in the epilimnetic zone, possibly promoting high abundances of planktonic species (Passy, 2008;Cantonati & Lowe, 2014). The strong influence of water depth in regulating the spatial diatom community patterns has also been shown in other lakes studies (Yang & Duthie, 1995;Stone & Fritz, 2006;Laird et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Relative Quantitative Importance Of Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…light availability, temperature), to which species often respond with decreased abundances. In contrast, these resources remain relatively stable in the epilimnetic zone, possibly promoting high abundances of planktonic species (Passy, 2008;Cantonati & Lowe, 2014). The strong influence of water depth in regulating the spatial diatom community patterns has also been shown in other lakes studies (Yang & Duthie, 1995;Stone & Fritz, 2006;Laird et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Relative Quantitative Importance Of Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This outcome leads to questions regarding the need for distinct lake-diatom assessment tools. Cantonati and Lowe (2014) highlighted similarities in the physical and biological pressures encountered by biofilms in the littoral zones of lakes and in rivers. In our study, the TDI metric calibrated on a river data set (Kelly et al 2008a) was strongly correlated with the LTDI but had a distinctly different response when applied to our lake data set.…”
Section: Do Diatoms Respond Differently In Lakes and Rivers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The river TDI used in our study fared better, perhaps because of its origin as an index of inorganic, rather than organic, enrichment (Kelly and Whitton 1995). Some taxa do appear to be more strongly associated with either lakes (e.g., Epithemia spp., some Cymbella species) or rivers (Hannaea arcus), but most diatoms are opportunistic and exploit the similarities between lake littoral zones and river beds (Cantonati and Lowe 2014). Thus, river metrics do offer a potential alternative to lake-specific metrics (Kahlert and Gottschalk 2014).…”
Section: Do Diatoms Respond Differently In Lakes and Rivers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many biotic indices, such as the Biological Diatom Index in France (Coste et al, 2009) were developed and are now standardized and routinely applied. More effort has been done to improve the monitoring using benthic diatoms in rivers than in lakes (Cantonati and Lowe, 2014). However, from several years things changed and some authors applied existing river diatoms indices to the littoral zone of lakes (Blanco et al, 2004;Bolla et al, 2010;Cellamare et al, 2011) while others developed new tools based on diatoms communities (Schaumburg et al, 2007;Stenger-Kovács et al, 2007;Marchetto et al, 2013;Bennion et al, 2014) to respond to the demands of lakes assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from several years things changed and some authors applied existing river diatoms indices to the littoral zone of lakes (Blanco et al, 2004;Bolla et al, 2010;Cellamare et al, 2011) while others developed new tools based on diatoms communities (Schaumburg et al, 2007;Stenger-Kovács et al, 2007;Marchetto et al, 2013;Bennion et al, 2014) to respond to the demands of lakes assessment. Indeed, whereas phytoplankton is considered as the main ecological indicator on lakes, and usually is used to assess the overall lake quality, littoral diatoms demonstrated their efficiency to assess point source pollution and to be early warning of lake's deterioration (Cantonati and Lowe, 2014;Rimet et al, 2016). Moreover, they can show a better ability to assess lake's trophic level than pelagic phytoplankton (Rimet et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%