Laissez‐faire, theIrish famine, andBritish financial crisis

Abstract

The decision in 1847 to cut Treasury spending on public relief efforts during the Irish famine is generally attributed by economic historians to the pervasive influence of ‘laissez‐faire’ ideas on the Whig government of Lord John Russell. This article draws on the papers of political leaders and contemporary financial information to argue that economic reasons were the trigger for the change in policy. Robert Peel and Charles Wood's macroeconomic policies of the 1840s, including the gold standard, the Bank Charter Act, and corn law repeal, left the Whigs unable to borrow to finance relief efforts in Ireland without panicking markets. The scaling back of public assistance programmes that resulted from this—and which increased mortality at the height of the Irish famine—was the unintended result of Peel and Wood's economic policies, in the context of the Whig government's parliamentary weakness.

Seven transformative crises from European revolution to corona: globalization and state capacity

“…But in the view of the British officials, the greatest evil of all was the neglect of the destitute by ‘those who in their several neighbourhoods’ had a duty to ‘alleviate the sufferings of the poor’ (Haines 2004, p. 240). A new twist to that story was recently given by Charles Read, who showed that the fiscal stance of the British government, with higher taxes on small and medium farmers and above all traders, gave the final push: driven into bankruptcy, these entrepreneurs emigrated, and the supply chain broke down (Read 2016). An Irish patriot who emigrated to the US concluded: ‘No sack of Madgeburg, or ravage of the Palatinate, ever approached in horror and desolation to the slaughters done in Ireland by mere official red tape and stationery, and the principles of political economy’ (Mitchel 2005, p. 218; Gillissen 2014).…”

What is P-20 and its Relationship to Engineering Technology?

“…Former USA presidential candidate Ron Paul (2013) states that all education should be the focus on education for leadership. Leonard Read (Read & Galles, 2013) emphasized that the foundation of leadership be the continual focus on self-improvement. Self-improvement can only be developed through studies of leadership coupled with the individual's desire to grow and participate in self-transformation.…”