1946
DOI: 10.1002/sapm194625149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laguerre Functions in the Mathematical Foundations of the Electromagnetic Theory of the Paraboloidal Reflector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second solution to the associated Laguerre differential equation has been investigated in the past by Bateman and Pinney in a completely different context, namely, analyzing the paraboloidal reflector [45,46]. Strictly speaking, our approach is totally different from theirs.…”
Section: Hankel Methods To Build the Laguerre Functions Of The Second...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second solution to the associated Laguerre differential equation has been investigated in the past by Bateman and Pinney in a completely different context, namely, analyzing the paraboloidal reflector [45,46]. Strictly speaking, our approach is totally different from theirs.…”
Section: Hankel Methods To Build the Laguerre Functions Of The Second...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For integer values of m, the denominator and numerator in Eq. (19) both equal zero, in which case U (m) ν (z) is defined as a limit in m. For large |z|, an asymptotic expansion for U (m) ν (z) exists, given by [1,12]…”
Section: Radial Functions For Largecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 16) and (17). The U (m) ν (z) are second solutions of the Laguerre differential equation, defined by [12]…”
Section: Radial Functions For Large Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, it can be viewed as a generalization of the parabolic rotational surfaces and, in fact, many authors call the latter paraboloids (e.g. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). Nor should the paraboloidal coordinate system be confused with the parabolic cylinder one [5,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%