2006
DOI: 10.1137/050628015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrangian Numerical Approximations to One‐Dimensional Convolution‐Diffusion Equations

Abstract: Abstract. This work focuses on the numerical analysis of 1D nonlinear diffusion equations involving a convolution product. First, homogeneous friction equations are considered. Algorithms follow recent ideas on mass transportation methods and lead to simple schemes which can be proved to be stable, to decrease entropy and to converge toward the unique solution of the continuous problem. In particular, for the first time, homogeneous cooling states are displayed numerically. Further, we present results on the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these ideas have been used in [27,28] for numerical purposes. Explicit in time numerical schemes for the equations of the inverse distribution function are proposed keeping the contraction of the Wasserstein distance at the discrete level.…”
Section: One-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these ideas have been used in [27,28] for numerical purposes. Explicit in time numerical schemes for the equations of the inverse distribution function are proposed keeping the contraction of the Wasserstein distance at the discrete level.…”
Section: One-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme can be understood as an explicit firstorder version of the advection-diffusion operator introduced in the previous section. In this setting we can follow the lines of [15,14] and derive a bound on ∆t that makes the scheme (3.1) monotonicity preserving:…”
Section: Monotonicity Preservation Of the Diffusion-taxis Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major bottleneck of this approach is the computation of W 2 2 (ρ, ρ k ), which is an infinite dimensional minimization problem. Hence, early works that use (3) avoid direct computing W 2 2 (ρ, ρ k ) either by linearization [11,42] or by diffeomorphisms [10,23,24], which lead to methods that lose some inherited properties in (3) or are limited by complicated geometry and structure. Only recent progress in computing W 2 has enabled the direct application of (3) [6,27,32,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%