2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4936578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrangian flows within reflecting internal waves at a horizontal free-slip surface

Abstract: In this paper sequel to Zhou and Diamessis ["Reflection of an internal gravity wave beam off a horizontal free-slip surface," Phys. Fluids 25, 036601 (2013)], we consider Lagrangian flows within nonlinear internal waves (IWs) reflecting off a horizontal free-slip rigid lid, the latter being a model of the ocean surface. The problem is approached both analytically using small-amplitude approximations and numerically by tracking Lagrangian fluid particles in direct numerical simulation (DNS) datasets of the Eule… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Hazewinkel (2010) and Horne (2015) assumed < u >= 0, an assumption that is not true at O(ǫ), the leading order of the Stokes Drift. It is well known (Wunsch 1971;Ou & Maas 1986;Zhou & Diamessis 2015;Beckebanze et al 2018b) and straight forward to determine from Eq. 7.1 that the vertical Stokes Drift component is identical (with opposite sign) to the vertical induced mean velocity, w, given by (4.8), such that the Lagrangian mean flow in the vertical direction vanishes at its leading order:…”
Section: Misconceptions Concerning Stokes Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both Hazewinkel (2010) and Horne (2015) assumed < u >= 0, an assumption that is not true at O(ǫ), the leading order of the Stokes Drift. It is well known (Wunsch 1971;Ou & Maas 1986;Zhou & Diamessis 2015;Beckebanze et al 2018b) and straight forward to determine from Eq. 7.1 that the vertical Stokes Drift component is identical (with opposite sign) to the vertical induced mean velocity, w, given by (4.8), such that the Lagrangian mean flow in the vertical direction vanishes at its leading order:…”
Section: Misconceptions Concerning Stokes Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, 'strong' refers to persistent, cumulative transfer of energy from the wave field into the mean flow. Strong mean flow generation is known to occur due to horizontal cross-beam variation (Bordes et al 2012;Kataoka & Akylas 2015;Semin et al 2016;Beckebanze et al 2018b), with important modifications by planetary rotation (Grisouard & Bühler 2012;Fan et al 2018), and upon reflection where incident and reflected beams interact (Thorpe 1997;Grisouard et al 2013;Zhou & Diamessis 2015;Raja 2018). Renaud & Venaille (2018) recently also found strong mean flow generation in a flat bottom boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are not able to perform the same comparison at Fr ∈ {16, 64}, for which the wave amplitudes are higher, due to the prohibitive computational cost. Moreover, it is found in § 5.3 that wave-induced Lagrangian transport, which is expected to be a second-order nonlinear effect in the wave's amplitude (Zhou & Diamessis 2015), scales strongly with Fr. In summary, while the nonlinear effects found in the wave-reflecting subsurface are not very strong in the cases examined here, it is still premature to reject their importance in the real oceanic parameter range (see more in § 6.5), where the wave amplitudes might be higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We focus on the lateral transport due to the nonlinear effects of the waves during reflection (Zhou & Diamessis 2015). This transport is found to be more significant at the higher Re = 10 5 with IWs of higher amplitude interacting with the surface, and the results are shown for R100F4 and R100F16 in figure 16.…”
Section: Wave-driven Lagrangian Flowsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Key ingredients for mean vertical vorticity production through streaming by internal waves beams -and hence vortical mean flow generation -are both viscous attenuation and horizontal-cross-beam variations of the wave beam amplitude. Several recent studies investigate vortical mean flow generation through streaming in truly three-dimensional settings, both numerically (King et al 2010;Grisouard & Bühler 2012;van den Bremer 2014;Zhou & Diamessis 2015;Raja 2018) and experimentally (Grisouard 2010;Bordes et al 2012;Grisouard et al 2013;Semin et al 2016;Kataoka et al 2017). Over long time scales, the vortical induced mean flow may become sufficiently energetic such that wave-mean flow interactions eventually lead to a breakdown of the internal wave itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%