Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer An
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2001.916277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrange relaxation based method for the QoS routing problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
268
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
268
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, looking at the corresponding worst-case formulae (6) and (11) shows that the exception is only a figment due to the overestimate: for (i, j) ∈ A , both schedulers give the same L/w ij latency, which is clearly the minimum possible (a packet needs to be fully received before it can be re-transmitted). Comparing (12) with (14) also shows that, coeteris paribus, the WRP latency is always smaller than or equal to that of FB; this is confirmed by the worst-case versions (11) and (13).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, looking at the corresponding worst-case formulae (6) and (11) shows that the exception is only a figment due to the overestimate: for (i, j) ∈ A , both schedulers give the same L/w ij latency, which is clearly the minimum possible (a packet needs to be fully received before it can be re-transmitted). Comparing (12) with (14) also shows that, coeteris paribus, the WRP latency is always smaller than or equal to that of FB; this is confirmed by the worst-case versions (11) and (13).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, as could be expected, CSP with two or more constraints, even additive or multiplicative ones, is already N P-complete [30,20]. Due to the typical strict requirements on the time to deliver the solution in practice (say, some 10s or 100s of milliseconds), it is natural that several efforts have been made to develop approximate approaches for the corresponding CSP (e.g., [15,33,16,13]). As an alternative, stochastic traffic models are used to compute guarantees on average QoS metrics [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exact solution to this problem is known to be NP-hard (Jüttner et al, 2001). However, there exist very good heuristics for finding approximate solutions.…”
Section: Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, all the paths that satisfy the constraint associated with one of the two metrics are computed and then the shortest path according to the second metric is selected. A straightforward method for heuristically solving the general MCP problem is via Metrics Combination (MC) [4,[14][15][16]. By combining a set of QoS metrics in a single metric, it is possible to use existing polynomial-time path computation algorithms, such as Bellman-Ford or Dijkstra.…”
Section: Algorithmic Aspects In Qos Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%