1984
DOI: 10.2307/2322987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrange Multiplier Problems in Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, by direct comparison to the method of Lagrange multipliers, our approach leads to general expressions for the Lagrange multipliers themselves. Given the often found connection between the Lagrange multipliers and physical quantities, these new expressions may yield some different and useful insights into various constrained problems of interest [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, by direct comparison to the method of Lagrange multipliers, our approach leads to general expressions for the Lagrange multipliers themselves. Given the often found connection between the Lagrange multipliers and physical quantities, these new expressions may yield some different and useful insights into various constrained problems of interest [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The savings side of U it can be described log-linearly where λ i (Equation 3) is introduced to convert the monetary savings into utility. In an economic sense, the Lagrangian multiplier λ i can be interpreted as the marginal effect of the monetary constraint on the overall utility of the customer or the rate of change in U it relative to the monetary constraint (Baxley and Moorhouse 1984). It helps us transform the constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained optimization problem by providing a link between the constraint (y it ) and the overall utility (U it ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a description must be the cornerstone of an optimal 13 Dutton (2010), p. 197 at 219; Kontorovich (2010), pp. 15 Baxley and Moorhouse (1984), pp. 14 Becker (1968), at 209.…”
Section: Methodology and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%