2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrange multiplier based vs micromorphic gradient-enhanced rate-(in)dependent crystal plasticity modelling and simulation

Abstract: A reduced strain gradient crystal plasticity theory which involves the gradient of a single scalar field is presented. Rate-dependent and rate-independent crystal plasticity settings are considered. The theory is then reformulated following first the micromorphic approach and second a Lagrange multiplier approach. The finite element implementation of the latter is detailed. Computational efficiency of the Lagrange multiplier approach is highlighted in an example involving regularization of strain localization.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model presented in previous sections was discretized using an Euler-backward (implicit) scheme and implemented in the finite element software Z-set (Besson and Foerch, 1998). Details on the finite element implementation of the Lagrange multiplier formulation were described in Scherer et al (2020). In the subsequent finite element simulations, 20-node brick finite elements are used.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model presented in previous sections was discretized using an Euler-backward (implicit) scheme and implemented in the finite element software Z-set (Besson and Foerch, 1998). Details on the finite element implementation of the Lagrange multiplier formulation were described in Scherer et al (2020). In the subsequent finite element simulations, 20-node brick finite elements are used.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is compared to the well established Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (Tvergaard and Needleman, 1984) approach for void growth and coalescence which relies on an effective porosity. The present work takes advantage of the strain gradient crystal plasticity model developed (without damage) and compared to the micromorphic approach in Scherer et al (2020). This finite strain formulation of strain gradient plasticity is based on a Lagrange multiplier method already successfully applied by Zhang et al (2018) for isotropic materials in the context of ductile fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical and thermodynamic derivation of the strain gradient extension S χ is provided in Reference [18]. An alternative formulation of a similar kind of strain gradient extension using a so-called augmented Lagrangian method can be found in [22].…”
Section: Crystal Plasticity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micromorphic approach has been extended to other types of mechanical variables, including plastic strain and damage variables by Forest (2009Forest ( , 2016. It was used to investigate strain localization phenomena by Dillard et al (2006); Anand et al (2012); Mazière and Forest (2015); Brepols et al (2017) and to predict size effects in crystal plasticity by Cordero et al (2010); Aslan et al (2011); Wulfinghoff et al (2013); Ling et al (2018); Scherer et al (2019Scherer et al ( , 2020; Ryś et al (2020). In contrast to Eringen's original micromorphic theory, the reduced-order micromorphic theory relies on a single scalar-valued additional degree of freedom at each material point, akin to accumulated plastic strain or slip (Wulfinghoff and Böhlke, 2012;Wulfinghoff et al, 2013;Erdle and Böhlke, 2017;Ling et al, 2018;Scherer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%