2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2137718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ladder operators and coherent states for the Jaynes-Cummings model in the rotating-wave approximation

Abstract: Transition of beam dynamics in waveguide arrays with commensurate Stark ladders Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 041115 (2012) Two-bit quantum random number generator based on photon-number-resolving detection Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 073109 (2011) Decoherence and surface hopping: When can averaging over initial conditions help capture the effects of wave packet separation? J. Chem. Phys. 134, 244114 (2011) Photon counting statistics of single molecule in solid matrix JCP: BioChem.Using algebraic techniques, we realize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this so called rotating-wave approximation the Hamiltonian (1) reduces to the JaynesCumming (JC) model, H JC = ω r a † a + ω q σ + σ − + g a † σ − + σ + a used widely in discussions of CQED physics. While appropriate in many relevant cases, recent implementations of circuit QED [23,24] achieved coupling strengths g where the counter-rotating terms begin to show significant deviations from the expectations of the JC model [1,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This is the so called "ultra-strong coupling" regime of parameters g ∼ ω r .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this so called rotating-wave approximation the Hamiltonian (1) reduces to the JaynesCumming (JC) model, H JC = ω r a † a + ω q σ + σ − + g a † σ − + σ + a used widely in discussions of CQED physics. While appropriate in many relevant cases, recent implementations of circuit QED [23,24] achieved coupling strengths g where the counter-rotating terms begin to show significant deviations from the expectations of the JC model [1,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This is the so called "ultra-strong coupling" regime of parameters g ∼ ω r .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 are the dressed states [13], which we label as |±, n defined in the Methods section, where n is the number of excitations in the cavity. The ground state for the JaynesCummings Hamiltonian is qualitatively different from the other dressed states, implying a non-trivial form of the raising operator [14]. This constitutes a further departure from usual Hubbard-like condensed-matter models, where the raising operator is not dependent on the number of excitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(1) are the dressed states [13], which we define as j; i i for one photon with spin per cavity and j; 0 i i for two photons with spin and 0 per cavity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%