2002
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-148-5-1241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LacZ-promoter fusions: the effect of growth

Abstract: Microbiology Comment provides a platform for readers of Microbiology to communicate their personal observations and opinions in a more informal way than through the submission of papers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a). The pre-steady-state period represents the time required for the β-galactosidase expression level to equilibrate between the synthesis rate and the growth rate (Warner & Lolkema, 2002). A similar time dependence for β-galactosidase activity was observed when B. subtilis CM002 was grown in the presence of -isocitrate, but the level of expression appeared to be somewhat lower than that observed for citrate (Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Citm Expressionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a). The pre-steady-state period represents the time required for the β-galactosidase expression level to equilibrate between the synthesis rate and the growth rate (Warner & Lolkema, 2002). A similar time dependence for β-galactosidase activity was observed when B. subtilis CM002 was grown in the presence of -isocitrate, but the level of expression appeared to be somewhat lower than that observed for citrate (Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Citm Expressionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…2c). The differences in β-galactosidase activity levels in the exponential growth phase between B. subtilis CM002 cultures grown on citrate or -isocitrate and on cis-aconitate could not be explained by different growth rates (Warner & Lolkema, 2002), since these were not affected much by the different substrates. To exclude the possibility that the observed induction of β-galactosidase activity by cis-aconitate might be the result of the slow conversion (hydration) of this TCA cycle intermediate into citrate or isocitrate during the course of bacterial growth, CSE minimal medium containing cis-aconitate was pre-incubated for 24 h at 37 mC under continuous shaking before inoculation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Citm Expressionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In conclusion, transcription of ptsH relative to that of crh was found to be three-to ninefold stronger when a PTS substrate is utilized (Table 2). Control experiments (see Materials and Methods) excluded the possibility that the different growth rates may affect the ␤-galactosidase activities (21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady-state level of expression of a gene product in growing cells depends both on the promoter activity and the growth rate (31). A fair comparison of expression levels measured at a single time point in terms of promoter activities, as done above, is valid only if the growth rate under the different growth conditions is similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double mutant deficient in both CcpA and RocR showed the highest levels of expression throughout the three growth phases, suggesting that the two repression mechanisms are independent. Expression of citM increased significantly in the stationary growth phase in all strains tested, most likely as a result of the decreased growth rate in this growth phase (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%