2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lacustrine responses to tephra deposition: examples from Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of sedimentological properties, the tephra layer has a low organic content, coarse grain size, and lower 210 Pb content in comparison with the rest of the core. Considering its mean size (equivalent to sand), it was probably deposited in a short period of time (Telford et al 2004). According to the dating ( 210 Pb, 137 Cs), the sediment core covers the last ~70 years and the tephra deposition represents ca.…”
Section: Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of sedimentological properties, the tephra layer has a low organic content, coarse grain size, and lower 210 Pb content in comparison with the rest of the core. Considering its mean size (equivalent to sand), it was probably deposited in a short period of time (Telford et al 2004). According to the dating ( 210 Pb, 137 Cs), the sediment core covers the last ~70 years and the tephra deposition represents ca.…”
Section: Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hickman & Reasoner (1994), also working with diatoms but in British Columbia, found that tephra deposition affected diatom production, but could not find an effect on diatom diversity. Telford et al (2004) described lacustrine responses to tephra falls, mainly represented in diatoms assemblages.…”
Section: Chironomidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that the interaction of volcanic ash deposition with a receiving lake triggers perturbations, primarily through the effect of tephra weathering but also through changes in pH, mineral concentration, organic matter input, and short-term light deprivation (e.g., Harper et al, 1986;Barker et al, 2003;Telford et al, 2004;Cruces et al, 2006;Urrutia et al, 2007;D'Addabbo et al, 2015). Depending on the magnitude of the disturbance and the resilience of the respective ecosystem (i.e., the amount of disturbance an ecosystem can tolerate without changing its regime; Holling et al, 1973Holling et al, , 1986Scheffer and Carpenter, 2003;Baho et al, 2014), lake biota may react with extinction events and/or changes in community structures and functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, tephra deposition in lakes and peatlands can alter the diatom community composition and diatom abundance (Harper et al, 1986;Hickman and Reasoner, 1994;Lotter et al, 1995), though not always (Telford et al, 2004). Tephra input can induce a change in water chemistry, causing altered diatom growth and/or preservation (for a review see Harper et al, 1986).…”
Section: Implications For Palaeoecological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%