“…The excavated sites contain a previously undocumented MSA industry characterized by a limited toolkit (also see Coulson et al, 2022;Staurset et al, 2022;Thomas et al, 2022). This includes the use of Levallois, discoidal and Kombewa approaches to the production of blanks, which are subsequently shaped by invasive retouch on one or both faces into symmetrical points.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were often located directly on top of silcrete/ calcrete occurences. Sites with diagnostic artefacts from the ESA, LSA and Iron Age were also present and are discussed in Coulson et al (2022), and associated chronologies presented in Burrough et al (2022) and Thomas et al, (2022). None of the surveyed sites had preserved faunal remains but given the presence of fossilized bone on the pan floor there is potential for the discovery of such sites.…”
Section: Archaeological Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also prioritized sites where several stages of lithic production were evidently present. To address goal 5, we factored in sites associated with dune edges, hardened clay areas and silcrete outcrops, and, for goal 6, those with higher potential for dating (see Burrough et al, 2022;Nash et al, 2022;Thomas et al, 2022). OSL dating at MAK14K, MAK14O, MAK15 and MAK33 (reported in detail by Burrough et al, 2022), revealed that the lithic industry at these sites was deposited during dry periods following palaeolake high stands dating to c.128e81 ka and c. 72e57 ka.…”
Section: Excavated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fracture patterns of these raw materials, prehistoric knappers would likely attain different results using these compared to Kalahari silcrete, lithic tradition notwithstanding. The shared typological and technological affinities with MSA sites towards the north and east (and the lack of such to the south) provide an interesting background for further investigations of regional migrations between contrasting environmental regions (see also Thomas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Regional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the Makgadikgadi Basin is a likely route for early migrations across the Kalahari, potentially bridging lithic traditions at the Tsodilo Hills (Coulson et al, 2011;Robbins et al, 2000a;Robbins et al, 2000b;Staurset and Coulson, 2014), in Zimbabwe (e.g., Larsson, 1996;Larsson, 2007), and Zambia (e.g., Barham, 2000;Burrough et al, 2019;Duller et al, 2015), with the more thoroughly documented MSA chronology of South Africa (e.g., Lombard, 2012;Wadley, 2015). Despite the lack of larger archaeological investigations, or even a regional dated chronology for the Stone Age, the Makgadikgadi-Okavango area was recently (Chan et al, 2019) suggested to be the homeland for the founder population of anatomically modern humans, based on modelling of mitochondrial DNA in current human populations (for contrary views see Ackermann et al, 2019;Schlebusch et al, 2019;Thomas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introduction: the Under-researched Msamentioning
“…The excavated sites contain a previously undocumented MSA industry characterized by a limited toolkit (also see Coulson et al, 2022;Staurset et al, 2022;Thomas et al, 2022). This includes the use of Levallois, discoidal and Kombewa approaches to the production of blanks, which are subsequently shaped by invasive retouch on one or both faces into symmetrical points.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were often located directly on top of silcrete/ calcrete occurences. Sites with diagnostic artefacts from the ESA, LSA and Iron Age were also present and are discussed in Coulson et al (2022), and associated chronologies presented in Burrough et al (2022) and Thomas et al, (2022). None of the surveyed sites had preserved faunal remains but given the presence of fossilized bone on the pan floor there is potential for the discovery of such sites.…”
Section: Archaeological Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also prioritized sites where several stages of lithic production were evidently present. To address goal 5, we factored in sites associated with dune edges, hardened clay areas and silcrete outcrops, and, for goal 6, those with higher potential for dating (see Burrough et al, 2022;Nash et al, 2022;Thomas et al, 2022). OSL dating at MAK14K, MAK14O, MAK15 and MAK33 (reported in detail by Burrough et al, 2022), revealed that the lithic industry at these sites was deposited during dry periods following palaeolake high stands dating to c.128e81 ka and c. 72e57 ka.…”
Section: Excavated Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fracture patterns of these raw materials, prehistoric knappers would likely attain different results using these compared to Kalahari silcrete, lithic tradition notwithstanding. The shared typological and technological affinities with MSA sites towards the north and east (and the lack of such to the south) provide an interesting background for further investigations of regional migrations between contrasting environmental regions (see also Thomas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Regional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the Makgadikgadi Basin is a likely route for early migrations across the Kalahari, potentially bridging lithic traditions at the Tsodilo Hills (Coulson et al, 2011;Robbins et al, 2000a;Robbins et al, 2000b;Staurset and Coulson, 2014), in Zimbabwe (e.g., Larsson, 1996;Larsson, 2007), and Zambia (e.g., Barham, 2000;Burrough et al, 2019;Duller et al, 2015), with the more thoroughly documented MSA chronology of South Africa (e.g., Lombard, 2012;Wadley, 2015). Despite the lack of larger archaeological investigations, or even a regional dated chronology for the Stone Age, the Makgadikgadi-Okavango area was recently (Chan et al, 2019) suggested to be the homeland for the founder population of anatomically modern humans, based on modelling of mitochondrial DNA in current human populations (for contrary views see Ackermann et al, 2019;Schlebusch et al, 2019;Thomas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introduction: the Under-researched Msamentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.