2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02721.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactose and fructose malabsorption in children with recurrent abdominal pain: results of double‐blinded testing

Abstract: Lactose intolerance nor fructose intolerance could be established as causes of RAP, according to preset criteria including elimination, open provocation and DBPC provocation. However, in clinical practice, persistent feeling of intolerance in some patients should be taken seriously and could warrant extended elimination with repeated challenges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
4
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In pediatric field there is no agreement on the methodological aspects of HBT even though the modifications of the test meal, the substrate dose, the test performance and the data analysis can have a marked influence on the test results. Studies in children have included lactose doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 g/kg, up to an absolute/maximum dose of 25–50 g [1,5,14]. No gold standard is available for the diagnosis of other sugar malabsorption and fructose as well as sorbitol HBT are therefore not recommended in clinical practice [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pediatric field there is no agreement on the methodological aspects of HBT even though the modifications of the test meal, the substrate dose, the test performance and the data analysis can have a marked influence on the test results. Studies in children have included lactose doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 g/kg, up to an absolute/maximum dose of 25–50 g [1,5,14]. No gold standard is available for the diagnosis of other sugar malabsorption and fructose as well as sorbitol HBT are therefore not recommended in clinical practice [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients received lactose (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) at a dose of 1 g/kg body weight (20% water solution; maximum dose 50 g), fructose (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) at a dose of 0.5 g/kg body weight (10% water solution; maximum dose 25 g), or sorbitol (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) at a dose of 0.2 g/kg body weight (10% water solution; maximum dose 10 g) in a drink of 6 ml/kg (maximum volume 300 ml) [5,11-14]. Patients could have more than one test, but only at different days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Malabsorption and intolerance to carbohydrates such as fructose and lactose are believed to cause symptoms such as bloating, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. 55 However, neither lactose nor fructose intolerance was established as a cause of pain in 220 children with RAP in a recent study, 58 and lactose restriction did not improve symptoms in pediatric trials. 39,40 Recently, diets of low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) have been extensively studied in adults.…”
Section: Alternative Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gijsbers et al (7) investigated malabsorption of lactose and fructose as causes of FAP in a group of 220 children (128 girls, mean age 8, years) utilizing the HBT with lactose load in 210 patients and fructose load in 121 patients. Malabsorption of lactose was found in 57 (27.0%) of 210 and of fructose in 79 (65.0%) of 121 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another pathway of fructose absorption occurs when it is ingested with glucose, by the mechanism called solvent drag, through the tight junctions of the enterocytes (24) . When the concentration of fructose in a certain food is present in excess of glucose concentration, condition very frequently observed in various juice fruits, mainly in apple, pear and grape juices, some individuals may develop fructose malabsorption (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)20) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%