To assess the impact of the germinal center (GC) reaction on viral spread in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, we isolated EBVIn latently infected B cells, distinct EBV gene expression patterns have been described. Besides expression of all latent EBV-encoded transcripts and proteins in latency III (also called growth program), more restricted viral latency gene expression patterns are observed under certain conditions (latencies I and II and latency program during persistence) (1). EBV-encoded genes differentially expressed in these latency programs were shown in vitro to mimic cellular proteins: EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-2 expressed in latency III is the main activator of viral and cellular genes and partially employs the Notch signaling pathways; latent membrane protein (LMP)-1 expressed in latencies II and III acts mainly like a constitutively active CD40 receptor; and LMP2A expressed in latencies II and III and perhaps in the latency program during persistence mimics and interferes with B cell antigen receptor signals (2-4).Despite these insights, remarkably little is known about the effects of EBV infection on the cellular differentiation pathways of the infected cells in vivo. Likewise, the primary cellular target(s) of the virus in the B cell compartment is controversial. With respect to the latter, it has been suggested that EBV initially infects naive B cells, which subsequently undergo a germinal center (GC) reaction to gain access to the memory B cell pool, the main reservoir of EBV in healthy virus carriers (5). In the GC reaction, somatic mutations are introduced into V genes of antigen-activated B cells during proliferation. Subsequently, GC B cells are selected for high-affinity binding to the respective antigen and finally differentiate into memory B cells or plasma cells (6). Hence, this model proposed that EBV ϩ B cells behave in the GC like uninfected B cells.However, our recent work on interfollicular EBV ϩ cells in IM tonsils suggested that the pool of infected memory B cells is generated by direct infection and subsequent expansion of these cells (7). Moreover, EBV-infected naive B cells may even be prevented from GC entry, as suggested by the blockade of GC formation in transgenic mice expressing LMP1 in B cells (8). These observations challenge the view that GC passage is a mandatory step in the general strategy of EBV to establish viral persistence.To address these issues directly, we isolated EBV ϩ GC B cells from the tonsils of IM patients and analyzed their rearranged antibody V genes. This analysis allows identification of clonal expansions of B cells, because V gene rearrangements are unique for each newly generated B cell and are inherited by its descendants (6). Moreover, the origin of B cells and their participation in the GC reaction can be examined by the V gene sequence analysis, because somatic mutations are introduced into rearranged V genes in the course of the GC reaction. Thus, naive B cells carry unmutated V gene rearrangements and GC and memory B cells carry mutated...