2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of self-averaging in random systems—Liability or asset?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On physical grounds, we have implemented a scaling approach based on the sample-to-sample fluctuations of the order parameter of the system. The outcome of this analysis indicated that the fluctuations of the system may be used as an alternative successful approach to criticality, as was also recently underlined by Efrat and Schwartz [60].…”
Section: Synopsissupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On physical grounds, we have implemented a scaling approach based on the sample-to-sample fluctuations of the order parameter of the system. The outcome of this analysis indicated that the fluctuations of the system may be used as an alternative successful approach to criticality, as was also recently underlined by Efrat and Schwartz [60].…”
Section: Synopsissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Our suggestion of employing the finite-size scaling behavior of the peaks of the sample-to-sample fluctuations of the order parameter was inspired by the intriguing analysis of Efrat and Schwartz [60]. These authors, studying also the d = 3 RFIM, showed that the behavior of the sample-to-sample fluctuations in a disordered system may be turned into a useful tool that can provide an independent measure to distinguish between the ordered and disordered phases of the system.…”
Section: Finite-size Scaling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 decreases as the system size increases [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. This implies that in the thermodynamic limit, the result for a single sample agrees with the average over the whole ensemble of samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This issue becomes particularly alarming as the system approaches the transition to the MBL phase [38,46,47]. If a quantity is non-self-averaging, the number of samples used in statistical analysis cannot be reduced as the system size increases [46,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. This reduction is a very common procedure due to the limited computational resources when dealing with exponentially large Hilbert spaces, but it may lead to wrong results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact calculations on hierarchical lattices are also currently widely used in a variety of statistical mechanics [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], finance [37], and, most recently, DNA-binding [38] problems.…”
Section: Renormalization-group Method: Migdal-kadanoff Approximamentioning
confidence: 99%