2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of regional association between atrial late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance and atrial fibrillation rotors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Also, in virtual studies using in silico CMR-based models of patient-specific LA structure and LGE SI, AF was inducible according to the level of LGE SI. 26 Recently, Chrispin et al 27 reported their data about regional association between atrial LGE SI from CMR and AF rotors from a focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided 27 statistical analysis could not detect a significant association between the extent of LGE SI and the presence of rotors in our cohort. This might lead to the suggestion that electroanatomic remodeling in patients with PERS has some different components, which are still not completely understood.…”
Section: Relationship Between Atrial Fibrosis and Rotor Distributionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Also, in virtual studies using in silico CMR-based models of patient-specific LA structure and LGE SI, AF was inducible according to the level of LGE SI. 26 Recently, Chrispin et al 27 reported their data about regional association between atrial LGE SI from CMR and AF rotors from a focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided 27 statistical analysis could not detect a significant association between the extent of LGE SI and the presence of rotors in our cohort. This might lead to the suggestion that electroanatomic remodeling in patients with PERS has some different components, which are still not completely understood.…”
Section: Relationship Between Atrial Fibrosis and Rotor Distributionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…28,29 On the other hand, NEEES and invasive mapping methods identified the presence of electric rotors without any anatomic reference. 27 This could probably be explained by the fact that rotors move and meander around a core 8,9,13 and might therefore not stay stable at the same position during MRI and NEEES. To finally understand that phenomenon, an analysis of rotor stability over the time and its correlation with LGE SI would be essential.…”
Section: Relationship Between Atrial Fibrosis and Rotor Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simulation study demonstrated that fibrosis spatial pattern analysis could be a novel avenue for persistent AF risk stratification. This is particularly noteworthy in light of recent clinical findings that showed a lack of association between the regional or global extent of LGE areas and AF-perpetuating re-entrant drivers, 50 suggesting that more robust quantitative metrics (such as FD m or local maps of FD and FE, as discussed above 44 ) could provide a better indication of the spatial localization of re-entrant drivers in the fibrotic atria.…”
Section: Fibrotic Determinants Of Re-entrant Driver Localizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The latter quantity (total fibrosis burden; FB) has been previously linked to higher risk of persistent AF. 49 Using the same set of patient-specific models described above, the prevalence of regions with highly intermingled fibrotic and non-fibrotic tissue in each case was assessed by median and upper quartile values of each unique FD metric distribution (FD 50 and FD 75 , respectively). Simulations demonstrated that atrial models in which rapid pacing did not induce AF had low both FB ( 11%) and FD 75 ( 0.1) values.…”
Section: Fibrotic Determinants Of Re-entrant Driver Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of early clinical trials, have not been replicated in recent studies [1417]. In addition, there is no spatial correlation between rotors identified clinically and the underlying myocardial scar tissue [18,19]. One potential explanation to account for the apparent contradiction is an error associated with spatial localization of rotors using currently available mapping technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%