2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61955-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of Preoperative Spinous Process Tenderness Does Not Affect Clinical Success of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tenderness to point pressure over the spinous processes of the fractured vertebrae is a sensitive test but the reproducibility of the test has not been validated. Another study [11] reported that the pain on palpation over the fractured vertebra is not a necessary requirement in selecting patients who will benefit from percutaneous vertebroplasty. Other factors, such as MR evidence of edema, should be taken into account in the decision to treat a patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tenderness to point pressure over the spinous processes of the fractured vertebrae is a sensitive test but the reproducibility of the test has not been validated. Another study [11] reported that the pain on palpation over the fractured vertebra is not a necessary requirement in selecting patients who will benefit from percutaneous vertebroplasty. Other factors, such as MR evidence of edema, should be taken into account in the decision to treat a patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no strong evidence that particular features of either the fracture itself or the treatment confer a better outcome. Specifi cally, outcomes appear unaltered by the presence of a cleft ( 57 ), the duration of pain ( 48 ), volume of cement infused ( 39,58 ), and subjective or objective pattern of pain ( 47,59 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2002 article by Gaughen et al [24] describes 10 of 100 consecutive patients with no point tenderness over their fracture site. These patients had "tenderness distant from the frac-ture (n = 5), tenderness lateral to the fracture (n = 4), or no focal tenderness at all (n = 1)."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%