2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42770-022-00859-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of molecular evidence of fecal-borne viruses in capybaras from São Paulo state, Brazil, 2018–2020: a minor public health issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous monitoring of sylvatic animals is essential to prevent and control the emergence or re-emergence of newly discovered viruses as well as viruses with known zoonotic potential, especially in anthropogenic environments. Capybaras are extremely tolerant to environmental changes and exhibit high vagility along waterways, thus having potential to trigger emerging zoonosis [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Continuous monitoring of sylvatic animals is essential to prevent and control the emergence or re-emergence of newly discovered viruses as well as viruses with known zoonotic potential, especially in anthropogenic environments. Capybaras are extremely tolerant to environmental changes and exhibit high vagility along waterways, thus having potential to trigger emerging zoonosis [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls for RT-qPCR inhibitors or for RNA extraction efficiency are not available for capybara origin specimens. Therefore, viability of capybaras stools screened in the present study was checked by MALDI-TOF MS and spiked with experimental specimens with rotavirus and adenovirus reference strains (representing enteric RNA and DNA viruses, respectively) as described elsewhere [ 52 ]. The WHO international standard for HEV NAT assays (Paul- Ehrlich-Institut code 6329/10, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany) was included in order to evaluate the analytical specificity of the RT-qPCR assay as well as serving as a positive control reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%