This investigation explores cortical connectivity in individuals diagnosed with migraine, employing high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) to discern distinctions between migraine with aura (MWA) and migraine without aura (MWoA). The cohort comprised 22 participants suffering from migraines, categorized into MWA (13 participants, including 7 females) and MWoA (9 participants, with 5 females), alongside a control group of 19 healthy individuals (8 females), exhibiting no history of migraines. The ages of the migraine and control groups were 29±1 and 27±1 years, respectively. The methodology involved exposing subjects to visual stimuli at frequencies of four Hz and six Hz, each for a duration of 2 seconds, interspersed with interstimulus intervals of 1 to 1.5 seconds. The frequencies were presented in a randomized sequence, with each being delivered 100 times. Through the acquisition of EEG data from 128 custom electrode positions, inter-and intra-hemispheric coherence during the interictal phase was meticulously analyzed. It was observed that individuals with migraines exhibited a pronounced reduction in alpha-wave pattern uniformity across both intra-and interhemispheric connections, a phenomenon markedly accentuated in the MWA group. Further, a unique functional connectivity metric derived from HD-EEG data during repeated SSVEP stimulation emerged as a potential biomarker capable of differentiating between MWA and MWoA subjects. Notably, a significant discrepancy in the slope between Block 1 and Block 6 was observed in MWA subjects, highlighting a distinct response irrespective of stimulation frequency. These findings underscore the clinical significance of cortical connectivity measures in understanding migraine pathophysiology and developing targeted treatments. The variation in alpha-band coherence could reflect differential sensory processing and neural communication mechanisms, potentially linked to Cortical Spreading Depression (CSD). Despite the promising insights, the limited sample size underscores the need for cautious interpretation of the results and further research. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on migraine-induced alterations in brain function, paving the way for refined diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.