2008
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.117.1.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of flexibility in visual grouping in patients with schizophrenia.

Abstract: The study attempted to distinguish automatic grouping processes from top-down processes in a visual perceptual task in 30 patients with schizophrenia and 30 matched controls. Participants decided whether 7 figures were all different or whether 2 adjacent figures were identical. The distance between figures was manipulated to produce 3 separated pairs of figures, the targets belonging to either the same pair (within-group trials) or different pairs (between-groups trials). As controls, patients benefited from p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
21
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(65 reference statements)
7
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These grouping mechanisms allow us to attribute object parts to the same object and to put together different objects that belong to a same group, e.g., the trees in a forest. Our results and those reported in the literature show that mildly symptomatic patients with schizophrenia benefit as much as controls from automatic grouping (Chey and Holzman, 1997; Silverstein et al, 1998; Giersch and Rhein, 2008; van Assche and Giersch, 2011), at least when grouping cues are unambiguous and when they do not lead to spurious grouping (see Kurylo et al, 2007; Silverstein and Keane, 2011 for limits to the benefits of automatic grouping in schizophrenia).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These grouping mechanisms allow us to attribute object parts to the same object and to put together different objects that belong to a same group, e.g., the trees in a forest. Our results and those reported in the literature show that mildly symptomatic patients with schizophrenia benefit as much as controls from automatic grouping (Chey and Holzman, 1997; Silverstein et al, 1998; Giersch and Rhein, 2008; van Assche and Giersch, 2011), at least when grouping cues are unambiguous and when they do not lead to spurious grouping (see Kurylo et al, 2007; Silverstein and Keane, 2011 for limits to the benefits of automatic grouping in schizophrenia).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The most likely explanation is that healthy participants learned the correspondence between the tap pairs and the visual organization of the visual targets. In the non-congruent condition, this might have been facilitated by the fact that healthy participants are able to build a representation that binds unconnected targets together (Giersch and Rhein, 2008; van Assche et al, 2012). Inasmuch participants “re-grouped” unconnected targets, they quickly learned to expect an absence of connecters between those visual targets that were to be tapped together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, the foregoing is not meant to imply that all high-level abilities are compromised in schizophrenia. Patients can suppress or enhance selected input (Luck and Gold 2008) or adapt to certain regularities in interelement grouping (Giersch and Rhein 2008). Future studies will need to test CI of closed and open contours (Kovács and Julesz 1993) to see whether CI deficits can be explained in terms of global shape processing (or “closure”) deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be of significant value, given the occurrence of alterations in visual perception in schizophrenia such as deficient perceptual organisation (Giersch and Rhein 2008;Giersch et al 2011;Silverstein and Keane 2011). Despite frequent reports of poor visual ability in these species (e.g.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 98%