2012
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of effect of nitrogen dioxide exposure on heart rate variability in patients with stable coronary heart disease and impaired left ventricular systolic function

Abstract: These findings suggest that NO(2) does not affect heart rate variability at these concentrations (which are high for urban background levels) and in the absence of other pollutants. While a synergistic effect has not been ruled out, these data lend support to the idea that the epidemiological data associating cardiac outcomes with NO(2) are more likely due to an associated pollutant rather than NO(2) itself.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was interpreted as strongly supporting the view that fine particles, and not NO 2 , were driving the previously reported cardiovascular effects, especially as NO 2 concentrations increased almost five-fold with the particle trap. Further evidence, suggesting the absence of an acute cardiovascular effect of NO 2 , was reported by Scaife et al (2012). In this study they found no significant changes in heart variability parameters in 18 heart bypass and myocardial infarction patients following exposure to 400 ppb NO 2 for 1 hour.…”
Section: Chamber Studiessupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was interpreted as strongly supporting the view that fine particles, and not NO 2 , were driving the previously reported cardiovascular effects, especially as NO 2 concentrations increased almost five-fold with the particle trap. Further evidence, suggesting the absence of an acute cardiovascular effect of NO 2 , was reported by Scaife et al (2012). In this study they found no significant changes in heart variability parameters in 18 heart bypass and myocardial infarction patients following exposure to 400 ppb NO 2 for 1 hour.…”
Section: Chamber Studiessupporting
confidence: 45%
“…The human chamber study evidence was also reviewed by the California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board (CARB, 2007) in their assessment of the California NO 2 standard. Since the publication of these reviews, limited NO 2 chamber studies that address lung function and airway inflammation have been performed, and two studies that address cardiovascular end-points have been published (Langrish et al, 2010;Scaife et al, 2012). Therefore, the conclusions that arise from these reviews remain valid for consideration of the current NO 2 standards.…”
Section: Chamber Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled human exposure studies have produced mixed results. Scaife et al reported no association between NO 2 exposure and heart rate, heat rate variability (HRV), ectopic beats, or arrhythmias in adults with stable IHD [128], while Huang et al reported significant associations with HRV in healthy young adults [129]. Riedl et al found no association with coagulation factors, blood pressure, oxygen saturation or cardiovascular symptom scores in individuals with mild asthma [130] and Langrish et al reported no significant associations with measures of fibrinolytic function in healthy males [131].…”
Section: Other Lines Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have shown that certain nitrogen oxides, e.g. NO 2 , do not affect heart rate variability at concentrations high for urban background levels and in the absence of other pollutants [56]. Others have shown that ambient NO 2 concentrations were inversely associated with SDNN and positively associated with LF/HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%