2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of concordance between a rapid bedside and conventional laboratory method of cardiac troponin testing: Impact on risk stratification of patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians' willingness to trust a non-laboratory assay in the process of discharging patients with a potentially lethal condition 5 6…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians' willingness to trust a non-laboratory assay in the process of discharging patients with a potentially lethal condition 5 6…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously there have been concerns that POC cTn assays lack the analytical sensitivity of laboratory assays, have higher levels of imprecision, lack of concordance with laboratory assays, and variability between assays that results in an overall lower clinical sensitivity for AMI [11][12][13][14][15][16]. This means that older POC assays carried the disadvantage that a higher proportion of patients with AMI were not detected, either overall or in the early period after onset of symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies have shown laboratory result turn-around times of 65-128 min and POC turnaround times of 15-26.5 min [17][18][19][20][21]. Recommendations for turnaround times by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and National Academy for Clinical Biochemistry for core laboratories suggest a maximum of 60 min and recommend that if this is not achievable, POC devices should be used [11,13,17]. Shorter turnaround times can potentially accelerate clinical decision making and patient discharge (in those with negative results) which may reduce ED and hospital overcrowding and have economical benefits; and possibly acceleration of treatment pathways (in those with positive results) which may improve outcomes, although a not insignificant false positive rate should alert physicians to employ clinical judgment in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…High sensitivity45 POC cardiac troponin biomarker testing can enhance cardiology services wherever specialists and trained local physicians are located, as both groups can provide crucial immediate treatment of appropriate targeted regimens [for STEMI and NSTEMI46] once the diagnosis is documented, working either locally in emergency rooms or via telemedicine to improve cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes in the regional system of small-world networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%