LACE Score-Based Risk Management Tool for Long-Term Home Care Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Taiwan

Abstract

Background: Effectively predicting and reducing readmission in long-term home care (LTHC) is challenging. We proposed, validated, and evaluated a risk management tool that stratifies LTHC patients by LACE predictive score for readmission risk, which can further help home care providers intervene with individualized preventive plans. Method: A before-and-after study was conducted by a LTHC unit in Taiwan. Patients with acute hospitalization within 30 days after discharge in the unit were enrolled as two cohorts (Pre-Implement cohort in 2017 and Post-Implement cohort in 2019). LACE score performance was evaluated by calibration and discrimination (AUC, area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve). The clinical utility was evaluated by negative predictive value (NPV). Results: There were 48 patients with 87 acute hospitalizations in Pre-Implement cohort, and 132 patients with 179 hospitalizations in Post-Implement cohort. These LTHC patients were of older age, mostly intubated, and had more comorbidities. There was a significant reduction in readmission rate by 44.7% (readmission rate 25.3% vs. 14.0% in both cohorts). Although LACE score predictive model still has room for improvement (AUC = 0.598), it showed the potential as a useful screening tool (NPV, 87.9%; 95% C.I., 74.2–94.8). The reduction effect is more pronounced in infection-related readmission. Conclusion: As real-world evidence, LACE score-based risk management tool significantly reduced readmission by 44.7% in this LTHC unit. Larger scale studies involving multiple homecare units are needed to assess the generalizability of this study.

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to emergency readmissions

“…46 Another study suggested that a data-driven approach for scheduling post-discharge interventions leads to a significant reduction in readmission rate by 44.7%, compared to regular visit-based home care. 47 With the accurate risk stratification in addition to the time-to-readmission outcome prediction, it is more likely to identify the most vulnerable period of each patient, such as the segment of the time-to-readmission risk curve where the slope changes drastically or when the risk exceeds a pre-set threshold. Thus, the scheduling of follow-up can be better tailored and individualized, and timeliness could be ensured.…”

Analysis of Older Adults under Home Care in Taiwan’s Ageing Society

“…In 2017, only 5.8% of all long-term care patients used institutional care, while 94.2% received home-based care [ 5 ]. Home care patients often have multiple comorbidities, which is demonstrated by the fact that 90.04% are classified into resource utilization groups 2 and 3 [ 6 , 7 ]. These patients require one or two additional specialized care services over and above ordinary healthcare services provided to group 1-classified patients.…”

Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats, and Opportunities a Pediatric Home Care Program in Covid 19 Virus Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

“…Most European countries consider home care as a priority in their health system. 17,18 The World Health Organization also prioritizes prevention and home care programs and emphasizes early discharge and continued home care. However, the health system in Iran has a treatment-based approach in which hospital care is preferable to community-based care in the health system.…”